Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Metinvest Sells United Coal (USA) — Move to Ease Financial Pressure Ahead of Bond Payments

Rinat Akhmetov’s group deconsolidated a U.S. asset; the buyer was not named. The sale is linked to losses at United Coal and the impending $428 million bond repayment in April 2026.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Metinvest Sells United Coal (USA) — Move to Ease Financial Pressure Ahead of Bond Payments
Фото: United Coal Company

What happened

In its 2025 operational report Metinvest said it is in the final stage of selling the US-based United Coal Company. The asset was already deconsolidated from the financial statements starting from the first half of 2025. The report does not name the buyer.

"The Group is in the final stage of selling United Coal Company (US). In connection with this, the asset was deconsolidated starting from the financial statements for the first half of 2025"

— Metinvest, 2025 operational report

Why this matters

United Coal is one of the leading producers of coking coal in the US (headquartered in Tennessee). The company was acquired by Metinvest in 2009 for an amount estimated at $800m–$1bn. In mid-2025 the group announced its intention to sell the asset: United Coal's losses were one of the key reasons for the group's negative financial result in the first half of 2025.

Financial context: deadline and risks

The sale is taking place against the backdrop of a significant obligation — in April 2026 Metinvest must repay bonds totaling $428m. This is not just an accounting operation: reducing risks and disposing of a loss-making asset can improve creditworthiness metrics and provide more room for negotiations with creditors.

Production and adaptation

In 2025 Metinvest produced 2.02 million tonnes of steel (−4% vs. 2024) and 1.78 million tonnes of pig iron (−2%). The decreases were related to the repair of Blast Furnace No. 9 at Kametstal in the second quarter. At the same time, flat products grew by 20% to 1.11 million tonnes thanks to resumed output in Italy, while long products rose by 7% to 1.32 million tonnes due to increased volumes at Kametstal and stable operations at Promet Steel in Bulgaria. Production of iron ore concentrate remained at 15.70 million tonnes — the halt at the Inhulets mine was offset by Hannivske.

What analysts say

Market experts note that selling an overseas asset under pressure to maintain financial discipline is a typical tool for quickly stabilizing the balance sheet. It does not solve all problems, but it reduces the operational risks that dragged the group into losses.

Conclusion — what's next for Metinvest and Ukraine

The sale of United Coal is a pragmatic step to cover shortfalls and reduce financial stress ahead of a major repayment. For Ukrainian industry it is a signal: even during a crisis, large players restructure portfolios to preserve the viability of production capacities. Now the move is up to the market and creditors — will this sale be enough to materially improve liquidity and enable the group to invest in repairs and the development of assets in Ukraine?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026