Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

International experts on Energoatom’s supervisory board: oversight of nuclear safety and procurement is changing

The nominations committee unanimously approved four independent members with experience at the IAEA, Westinghouse and EDF — what this means for nuclear power plant safety, partners’ confidence and the safeguarding of public funds.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 31, 2025 · 2 min read

International experts on Energoatom’s supervisory board: oversight of nuclear safety and procurement is changing

Brief and important

The nominations committee unanimously approved four international independent members of the supervisory board of NAEC "Energoatom". This decision is not a symbolic gesture but a step toward restoring external oversight, raising nuclear safety standards, and increasing procurement transparency.

Who joined the board

Rumina Velshi (Rumina Velshi) — an international expert in nuclear safety and regulatory oversight with more than 40 years of experience; former head of Canada's nuclear regulator and of the IAEA Safety Standards Commission.

Laura Garbenciute-Bakiene (Laura Garbenciute-Bakiene) — a specialist in finance, audit and risk management in the energy sector; over 25 years at PwC and on projects auditing strategic energy facilities, including the Ignalina NPP.

Patrick Fragman (Patrick Fragman) — an engineer and manager with more than 30 years of experience in the nuclear and energy sectors; former president and CEO of Westinghouse Electric Company.

Brice Bohuon (Brice Bohuon) — a lawyer in energy regulation and corporate governance; worked at EDF International and EDF Energy and has experience in French state regulatory institutions.

Procedure and international support

The selection was unanimous. The nominations committee included government representatives and independent observers — the European Union, the EBRD, the IFC and the Business Ombudsman. The board's formation is expected to be completed after the additional appointment of three state representatives in the first half of January.

"At the same time, we continue the renewal of supervisory boards across the entire energy sector — at Naftogaz, Ukrhydroenergo, Ukrenergo, the Gas Transmission System Operator, Centrenergo and other companies. In total — 12 companies are in focus"

— Yuliia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister of Ukraine

Context: why this matters

After the exposures at Energoatom, the state decided to restart corporate governance in state energy companies. The presence of experts from the IAEA, Westinghouse and EDF is a signal to international partners: Ukraine is raising safety and accountability standards. This matters not only technically, but also for access to financing, reactor repairs and infrastructure modernization.

In addition, state audits of Energoatom and defence-sector enterprises are ongoing; their results will be handed over to law enforcement — a practical mechanism to hold those responsible for corrupt abuses to account and, at the same time, a means of restoring taxpayers' trust.

What’s next

The decision to include international experts is a beginning, not the final step. Next actions include appointing the state members of the board, implementing the independent members' recommendations, and applying the audit results to the governance system. For the state, this is an opportunity to establish standards that will make the energy sector more resilient and less vulnerable to corruption risks.

Conclusion: an updated supervisory board with strong international experts increases the chances of transparent management of Energoatom, ensures nuclear safety and restores partners' trust — and therefore improves the prospects for more stable financing of Ukraine's critical infrastructure.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026