Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Moldova and Palestine Instead of the EU: How Wartime Flour Logic Is Changing Ukrainian Millers

The EU's share of Ukrainian flour exports fell from 44% to 35% over the course of a year. This is not merely trade statistics — it is a reflection of how the opening of the sea corridor is rewriting the geography that the blockades themselves had shaped.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 8, 2026 · 3 min read

Moldova and Palestine Instead of the EU: How Wartime Flour Logic Is Changing Ukrainian Millers
Фото: Depositphotos

Over nine months of the 2025/26 marketing year, Ukraine exported 48,300 tons of wheat flour — 3% less than a year earlier. But the real story is not in this figure: it lies in where the flour is going and where it is returning from.

Moldova, Palestine — and EU decline

The share of EU countries in Ukrainian flour export structure has shrunk from 44% to 35%. The top-5 buyers according to "Flour Millers of Ukraine" look like this: Moldova — 14,900 tons, Palestine — 9,200 tons, Czechia — 7,400 tons, Israel — 4,400 tons, Spain — 4,200 tons.

This list contains a paradox of wartime logistics. Before the full-scale invasion, Ukraine supplied flour by sea to a wide geography: the UAE, Palestine, Israel, Djibouti, Angola. After the Black Sea ports were blocked, the main buyers became land neighbors — Poland, Romania, Moldova, Croatia. Now, with the restoration of sea routes, Palestine returns to the top-2, while the purely "transit" advantage of the EU weakens.

Flour imports to Ukraine grew by 21%

In parallel, "Flour Millers of Ukraine" recorded growth in flour imports to Ukraine — 21% compared to last season. This is a detail that can easily be missed in the line about 3% export decline — but it is precisely this that reveals the pressure within the industry.

"The flour market in Ukraine has always been highly competitive, but during the period of the great war, competition has increased even more. This happened against the backdrop of an increase in the number of mills, population outflow, and declining demand among industrial consumers".

Rodion Rybchynskyi, head of the "Flour Millers of Ukraine" union, elevatorist.com

The growth in the number of mills during the war is a counterintuitive fact. Small and medium-sized enterprises were opening, focusing on local demand, but together with imports of pasta products from Poland, Turkey, and Italy, they are squeezing the margins of the entire sector.

The Chinese horizon: open, but not wide open

In April 2025, China's ambassador to Ukraine, Ma Shenkun, signed a protocol on sanitary and phytosanitary requirements for Ukrainian wheat flour — the result of at least three years of negotiations. The same week, Beijing blocked 39 out of 66 Kazakhstani animal feed flour producers over the requirement not to use Russian grain.

According to Euromaidan Press, Ukrainian food-grade flour enters China under a different — higher — tariff category than Kazakhstani animal feed flour, which previously entered duty-free. Whether the signed protocol provides for preferential tariffs — neither side has clarified.

  • 48,300 tons — wheat flour exports for July–March 2025/26 MY
  • –9 p.p. — decline in EU share over the year (from 44% to 35%)
  • +21% — growth in flour imports to Ukraine
  • China — new potential market, sanitary access is open, tariff access is in question

If Kyiv and Beijing agree on tariff terms, the Chinese market could change the entire balance of this statistics. But for now, flour millers are making money from Moldova and Palestine, while on their own market they compete with their own new mills.

The question for autumn: will the next season record a recovery in the EU share — or will the sea corridor permanently return Ukraine to pre-war Middle Eastern markets, displacing the European direction to the status of a transit peak of 2022–2023?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026