Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Oil at $115: Why the Market Doesn't Believe Trump

Brent futures rose nearly 3% despite statements by the US president about the imminent end of the conflict with Iran. For Ukraine, this means higher inflation and a hole in the trade balance.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 30, 2026 · 1 min read

Oil at $115: Why the Market Doesn't Believe Trump
Фото: EPA / Henry Chirinos

Tetiana from Kharkiv is paying one third more for gasoline than a year ago. She knows this intuitively — but on March 30 it was confirmed by the London ICE Futures exchange: Brent crude surpassed $115.84 a barrel, rising nearly 3% in a single trading day.

Notably, the jump occurred exactly at the moment when Donald Trump said the war with Iran could "end soon." The market ignored that rhetoric — and that speaks more loudly than any analyst commentary.

The mechanism of impact on Ukraine is straightforward. According to the National Bank of Ukraine, if fuel prices hold at current levels, their direct contribution to annual inflation will amount to 0.45 percentage point. But there are also secondary effects: the cost of fuel is built into the production cost of every product — from bread to building materials. The NBU estimates these effects to be twice as large as the direct ones.

A separate blow hits the trade balance. Ukraine imports oil, gas and fertilizers. The more expensive these resources are on the world market, the more currency flows out of the country — and the less remains for other needs, including reconstruction.

So the real conflict here is not between Trump and Tehran — but between official optimism and market mathematics. The former speaks of de-escalation; the latter prices in the opposite scenario.

The question that will determine the coming months: will this mathematics change if diplomatic progress in talks with Iran becomes not rhetoric but a verified fact with specific dates and control mechanisms?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026