Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Oil at $58 — Gasoline Still the Same: Why Gas Station Prices Lag Behind the Market

Brent falls to four-year low as OPEC+ increases production volumes — but Ukrainian private gas station networks are in no hurry. Government pressures through Ukrnafta.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Oil at $58 — Gasoline Still the Same: Why Gas Station Prices Lag Behind the Market
Фото: depositphotos.com

Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko met with the head of the board of NAK "Naftogaz" Sergiy Koretsky and publicly called on fuel market operators to lower prices. The reason is not domestic politics, but a global shift in the oil market.

What happened in the global market

On April 7, 2025, Brent crude fell to a four-year low — below $60 per barrel, and after OPEC+'s decision on May 3 to increase production by an additional 411 thousand barrels per day — dropped to $58. Triggers: escalation of the tariff war between the US and China and Saudi Arabia's demonstrative course toward increasing supply. According to Reuters data, this made oil one of the worst commodity assets of 2025.

For comparison: in February 2022, at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, Brent cost over $110. The current decline is not a correction, but a structural shift.

Mechanism of pressure — state "Ukrnafta"

There is no direct price regulation for fuel in Ukraine. Therefore, the government traditionally uses the state gas station network "Ukrnafta" as a valuable price benchmark for the market. Svyrydenko confirmed: "Ukrnafta" has already begun reducing prices. A signal for private networks.

"Fuel prices should be formed fairly, taking into account the current situation, including global markets, but without internal speculation. Regulatory bodies, in particular the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the State Food and Consumer Service, should conduct proper monitoring"

Yulia Svyrydenko

This is not the first time that the AMCU has been used as a tool to pressure gas station operators. Last time — during a price surge due to the Middle East situation — the committee sent requests to the largest networks demanding explanations for the increase. Then, as DeepState noted, there was no real impact of the Middle East crisis on Ukrainian prices — the networks took advantage of the information occasion.

How much and when

Economist Oleg Pendzyn forecasts a noticeable reduction in petroleum products at Ukrainian gas stations in the near future — if oil remains at $60 and below. Svyrydenko clarified: "If current global dynamics persist, a more significant decline is expected".

The problem is that there is a lag between the fall in quotations and the pump price — logistics, customs, distributor margins. Private operators typically respond to price declines more slowly than to price increases.

If OPEC+ does not reverse its production decision in June, and the US-China tariff confrontation does not ease — the market will have new grounds for decline. But if private networks again wait for "Ukrnafta" to be the first to lower prices, the question to the AMCU will not be rhetorical: why does monitoring only work after public pressure from the prime minister?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026