Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Next winter at risk: why Ukraine 'was too late' to strengthen its energy system

The former head of Ukrenergo warns: without strengthening major power plants and the rapid deployment of 500–600 MW of decentralized generation, the next heating season could be tougher. We examine what can realistically be achieved in time and how much large-scale restoration would cost.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 19, 2026 · 3 min read

Next winter at risk: why Ukraine 'was too late' to strengthen its energy system
Фото: Медіацентр Україна

Why this matters right now

Volodymyr Kudrytskyi's interview with LIGA.net sounded like a technical warning: the country has a limited window of time until the next heating season, and a large share of measures to boost the energy system's resilience will no longer have time to affect its course. This is a security issue — not abstract statistics: the stability of electricity supply determines heating in hospitals, the operation of municipal services and people’s lives in the harshest frosts.

Main point of Kudrytskyi's statement

Kudrytskyi emphasizes that rolling out large-scale decentralized capacities takes time: technical procedures, procurement and grid connections. Therefore, no significant effect should be expected before the start of the next heating season — at best, the consequences can be partially mitigated.

"Since we are speaking in mid‑February, we have nine months until the next heating season. One can say that we will no longer manage to deploy any significant additional amount of decentralized generating capacity"

— Volodymyr Kudrytskyi, former chairman of the board of NEC "Ukrenergo" (interview with LIGA.net)

What can be achieved in time

According to Kudrytskyi, short-term measures are realistic: fortifying large power plants and substations, and the deployment of 500–600 MW of additional decentralized gas generation. This will not solve the problem radically, but it will reduce the scale of emergency outages in the event of new attacks.

At the same time, the current management of Ukrenergo (Vitalii Zaichenko) estimates the long-term need at roughly 9.5 GW of new generation — gas‑fired power plants, biofuel thermal power plants, energy storage installations and "green" generation. The estimated cost of such a project is over €8 billion. This is a marker for international partners and investors: the speed of financing will determine how quickly the country's energy resilience grows.

Context of attacks on the energy sector

Since autumn 2025, Russia has systematically attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure with massive missile and drone strikes; the peak fell in January–February 2026 during an unusually cold winter. According to President Volodymyr Zelensky, on territory under government control there are practically no large power plants that have not been shelled (excluding nuclear).

"Accordingly, if strikes of the same intensity as during this winter continue, and similar severe frosts recur, the next winter will also be difficult"

— Volodymyr Kudrytskyi, former chairman of the board of NEC "Ukrenergo" (interview with LIGA.net)

How realistic the plan is and what comes next

The realistic plan has two components: short operational steps (fortifications and 500–600 MW of gas generation) and a medium‑term program of 9.5 GW over roughly 2–3 years. The first provides local risk mitigation; the second — a fundamental increase in network resilience. The questions are the speed of financing, procurement logistics and investors' willingness to operate under wartime conditions.

Energy market experts and Ukrenergo's leadership agree: it is impossible to completely avoid risks in the short term, but it makes sense to concentrate on measures that deliver the maximum effect in the shortest possible time.

Conclusion

The scenario for next winter depends on two things: the intensity of the strikes and the speed of implementation of protective and generation projects. The question for international partners and the market is whether they are ready to transform political declarations into financial and technical solutions quickly and at scale. Without that, the coming heating season will remain a test for infrastructure and society.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026