Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

One Company Takes 92% of Industry Profit: What This Means for Ukraine's Confectionery Market

Roshen earned 7.9 billion hryvnias in net profit — accounting for almost the entire result of the industry among 272 companies. This is not merely market leadership, but structural concentration that has accelerated due to the war.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 2 min read

One Company Takes 92% of Industry Profit: What This Means for Ukraine's Confectionery Market
Фото: пресслужба Roshen

Ukraine's confectionery industry in 2024 recorded over 75 billion hrn in total revenue and 8.6 billion hrn in profit — with 92% of this profit going to a single corporation. According to data from the analytical platform VKURSI, of 272 registered producers of cocoa, chocolate, and sugar confections, only 136 ended the year in profit, while 41 posted losses.

Roshen's numbers — and everyone else

Revenue from six major enterprises of the Roshen corporation in 2024 grew by 15.4% to 46.4 billion hrn. The main operating structure of the group, State Enterprise "Confectionery Corporation Roshen," alone generated 37.3 billion hrn in revenue and net profit of 6.4 billion hrn — an increase of 15.1%. Combined with affiliated group enterprises — the Vinnytsia Dairy Plant (226.7 million hrn in profit), the Kremenchuk Factory (14.9 million hrn), and others — the group's aggregate result approaches 7.9 billion hrn. This explains the 92% share of the industry indicator.

By comparison, Kharkiv-based "Biskvit-Shokolad," which rose to second place in the market over several years of war after competitors lost production capacity in occupied territories, controls less than 8% of the market by volume. AVK and "Konti" — former contenders for market leadership — significantly reduced their presence after losing production facilities in Donbas and Luhansk region.

Why concentration grew right now

The market structure changed not through aggressive acquisitions, but through the geography of destruction. Production capacities of "Konti," AVK, and a number of smaller players were concentrated in the east — and after 2014–2022, either ended up in occupied territories or suffered direct destruction. Roshen, in contrast, preserved its main production facilities in Vinnytsia, Kyiv, and Kremenchuk.

In parallel, the corporation is actively increasing exports. According to the global Candy Industry ranking, Roshen is among the world's top-15 confectionery companies — and is the only Ukrainian representative on this list.

"The Ukrainian candy market is divided into three categories. Each manufacturer is strong in its own segment: chocolate, baked goods. The leader in all categories is Roshen."

Galinfo / State Statistics Service data

What 92% means for the market itself

High profit concentration is not the same as price monopoly or lack of competition. But it creates several practical consequences:

  • Investment imbalance: small and medium confectioners, most of which either broke even or posted losses, lack resources for modernization and lose out in logistics and marketing.
  • Risk of dependence on one player: if Roshen faces disruptions — through shelling, logistics, or ownership change (the corporation belongs to Oleksii Poroshenko) — the industry has no equivalent production capacity reserve.
  • Foreign capital paradox: 17 companies with foreign beneficiaries are present in the market, but according to VKURSI data, foreign capital does not dominate — which limits the inflow of external investment to Roshen's competitors.

If confectionery production facilities in deoccupied territories begin to recover after the active phase of the war ends — will the market be able to redistribute profit more evenly again, or has the "one player — all profit" structure already become the new normal?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026