Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

One tanker per week: why Novorossiysk dropped out of the Kremlin's oil schedule

Drones, regulator ban and weather struck simultaneously at Russia's main Black Sea oil port — and it's already reflected in budget revenues.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 12, 2026 · 2 min read

One tanker per week: why Novorossiysk dropped out of the Kremlin's oil schedule
Фото: depositphotos.com

From May 4-10, only one oil tanker departed from Novorossiysk. According to Bloomberg data, this caused the average weekly export figure to drop to 3.64 million barrels per day — the first decline since March. For comparison: the week before — 3.68 million. The difference is small in percentage terms, but it's already a loss from the budget that finances the war.

Three converging factors

Bloomberg cites two possible explanations for the shutdown — unfavorable weather and the threat of Ukrainian drone attacks. But there is a third, official one: in May, Transneft announced a 90-day ban on berth No. 8 operations following an unscheduled inspection by transport supervisory authorities.

"A temporary ban on operations has been introduced at oil berth No. 8. The port authority is required to eliminate all identified violations by June 30, 2025"

— Transneft statement cited by Reuters

According to Rigzone, inspections are being conducted by order of Putin following a large-scale oil spill in the Black Sea in December of last year — and also cover the ports of Taman and Tuapse. In other words, regulatory pressure on the entire Black Sea infrastructure has increased systematically, not just in Novorossiysk.

In parallel — drones. Ukrainian unmanned aircraft have previously forced Transneft to halt oil pumping to the port, and an attack on the Sheskharis oil depot damaged shore facilities. Two terminals near Novorossiysk — Sheskharis and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium terminal — together pump over 2 million barrels per day, making any shutdown here felt on the global market.

What this means for the Kremlin

Prices for Russian oil from Black Sea and Pacific ports, according to Bloomberg citing Argus Media, have already fallen to the lowest level since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. Pressure simultaneously from three sides — regulatory, security, and price-related — is reducing the margin that Moscow can direct toward its defense budget.

  • Regulator closed berth No. 8 until the end of June
  • Drones create constant uncertainty for tanker operators
  • Urals price at its lowest since 2022

Meanwhile, Transneft refuses to comment on any shutdowns related to security incidents — which complicates external assessment of actual losses.

If the ban on berth No. 8 remains in place until June 30, and drone threats do not disappear, the key question is whether Russia will be able to compensate for the Black Sea shortfall through Baltic and Far Eastern ports quickly enough to avoid feeling it in the budget already in June.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026