Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

O'Leary named Wizz Air a bankruptcy candidate — and turned out not to be the only one who believes it

While Ryanair's CEO hands out predictions to the press, Latvia quietly rescues its airline with state credit. The difference between survival and collapse in aviation is now measured not by routes, but by the percentage of hedged fuel.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 2 min read

O'Leary named Wizz Air a bankruptcy candidate — and turned out not to be the only one who believes it
Фото: EPA / MAURIZIO BRAMBATTI

The conflict surrounding Iran, which began at the end of February, has accomplished what neither the pandemic nor rising interest rates could: it has simultaneously threatened several European airlines at once. The price of aviation fuel skyrocketed from ~$74 to $150 per barrel — and for carriers without hedging, this is no longer financial pressure but an existential threat.

Those who hedged will survive

Ryanair entered the crisis with protection: according to O'Leary, the company fixed 80% of its fuel needs at $67 per barrel before the conflict began, with coverage through March 2027. Wizz Air — approximately 70%. AirBaltic, according to bne IntelliNews, hedged only 6% of current quarterly needs — the lowest figure among European carriers.

This very figure explains why the Latvian parliament voted on April 16 for an emergency state loan to the airline for €30 million — 49 votes to 23, after weeks of disputes that nearly collapsed the ruling coalition. The loan must be repaid by August 31.

"If oil remains at these levels, two or three European airlines in October or November could go bankrupt — like Wizz Air, which wants to sue me but won't have time, and airBaltic"

— Michael O'Leary, CEO of Ryanair, in an interview with Il Sole 24 Ore

Wizz Air denies, but cautiously

Wizz Air rejected O'Leary's forecast as "absolutely untrue and false," emphasizing its strong balance sheet and liquidity. CEO József Varadi noted that the company does not expect fuel supply problems — global supply chains are being rebuilt, including through imports from the United States. However, Wizz Air itself admits: customers are adopting a "wait and see" approach regarding summer bookings, and the financial impact of the crisis is estimated at €50 million.

Ryanair is also not immune to costs: in April alone, the company paid an additional $50 million for fuel. Shares fell from €32 to €25 since the beginning of the conflict. The difference is that O'Leary can afford to speak of others' bankruptcies — because his own reserve of strength gives him this luxury.

The market logic of a predator

O'Leary does not hide his interest: Ryanair is not seeking merger candidates, but is ready to buy aircraft from airlines that exit the market. "Good for our business — there will be fewer competitors," he added. This is not cynicism for cynicism's sake: after the bankruptcies of Monarch, Norwegian, and WOW Air, it was Ryanair and easyJet that absorbed most of the freed-up demand.

  • Ryanair: 80% hedging at $67/barrel, coverage through March 2027
  • Wizz Air: ~70% hedging, denies risks, acknowledges booking pressure
  • AirBaltic: 6% hedging, received €30 million state loan, repayment deadline — August

The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively blocked for now. If the situation does not change by November, the key test will not be whether Wizz Air will go bankrupt — but whether AirBaltic's €30 million state loan will be enough to make it through winter without a second rescue package.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026