Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

OPEC Produces Less Oil Than in 1990 — And It's Not Sanctions, But a 54-Kilometer Pipeline

In April, OPEC cut production to 20.55 million barrels per day — a 36-year low. Behind this figure stands one narrow point on the map that controls a fifth of the world's oil supply.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 6, 2026 · 2 min read

OPEC Produces Less Oil Than in 1990 — And It's Not Sanctions, But a 54-Kilometer Pipeline
Фото: EPA

A Bloomberg April report recorded a figure that hadn't appeared since the Persian Gulf War: OPEC production fell to 20.55 million barrels per day — the lowest level since 1990. But the figure itself is less telling than the reason behind it.

One strait — a fifth of the world

The Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman is a 54-kilometer shipping corridor. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2024, 20 million barrels passed through it daily — approximately 20% of global oil and oil product consumption. There are virtually no alternative routes: bypass pipelines cover only a small fraction of this volume.

When in February–March 2026 a conflict between the USA, Israel, and Iran paralyzed shipping through the strait, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia found themselves trapped by their own reserves: the oil exists, but there's nowhere to ship it.

March collapsed sharply, April consolidated the decline

According to Bloomberg, production fell steeply in March by 8.6 million barrels per day — the largest decline in a decade. April added another 420,000 barrels per day in cuts: additional pressure came from losses in Kuwait and Iran.

"Seven OPEC+ countries decided to implement production adjustments of 188,000 barrels per day" — a symbolic increase for June that the cartel announced against the backdrop of an actual supply collapse.

OPEC+ statement following the meeting, May 2026

Analysts called the decision "largely symbolic": actual production by signatory countries is limited not by quotas but by the physical impossibility of transportation.

UAE exits — and this changes the equation

Parallel to the production decline, the UAE announced its exit from OPEC, freeing itself from cartel limits. According to OPEC estimates, the Emirates possess 6.7% of proven global oil reserves — approximately 98 billion barrels. As economist Vitaliy Shapran explains, the UAE's motivation is primarily security-related: the country suffered most from Iranian strikes. When the conflict ends and the Emirates resume full production, this will create downward pressure on prices — and directly impacts Russia's revenues in Asian markets.

What $80 per barrel means for Ukraine

After the Strait of Hormuz blockade, Brent jumped to $82 and higher. For Ukraine, this is a double-edged sword: lower Russian oil revenues in case of a prolonged conflict and limited supplies — and simultaneously higher costs for imported fuel and logistics. According to the baseline consensus of the EIA, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan, Brent in 2025–2026 will remain in the range of $60–70 per barrel — but this is a scenario without escalation.

If the strait remains blocked for another month or two, the IEA forecasts that global oil supply in 2026 could reach a record 108.6–108.7 million barrels per day — but primarily due to the USA, Brazil, and Guyana, rather than the Persian Gulf.

The question is not whether OPEC production will resume — it will, once the strait opens. The question is whether the cartel can maintain unity before the UAE, Russia, and Saudi Arabia begin competing for the same Asian markets without joint quotas.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026