Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Paradox of War: NBU Revokes 'Light Finance' License

The National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) revoked the license of "Light Finance" for repeatedly ignoring the regulator's requirements — this is a test of the resilience of our financial system and a signal to all who undermine market confidence.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

Paradox of War: NBU Revokes 'Light Finance' License

A paradox that strengthens defense

The paradox of war: they try to break us, and we respond with firmness and order. The National Bank revoked the license of LLC "Light Finance" — a decision made on December 15 by the Committee on the Supervision and Regulation of Non-Bank Financial Services Markets. This is not just a piece of paper — it is protection for our people who use the services of financial institutions, and a safeguard for the entire economy.

What happened

The regulator applied a sanction due to systematic failure to submit reports and ignoring requirements. "Light Finance" did not provide information, explanations and documents within the established deadlines, including reports for September 2025 and for the nine months of 2025. This is already the second similar violation within a year: on October 20, 2025 the NBU had already applied measures for failure to submit the August 2025 report — the company was given time until November 10, 2025, but the requirements were not met.

When private players systematically ignore the rules, the state must act — it is a matter of market trust and safety.

– A Western analyst, an expert in financial supervision

Who stands behind the companies

According to open registries, the ultimate beneficiary of LLC "Light Finance" is Mykola Chornyi, who also serves as the director. The company's founder is listed as LLC "Premium IKS", which owns 100% of the charter capital.

At the same time, the NBU issued an order to LLC FC "Svarog Finance", which must remedy the violations by January 5, 2026. As of October 1, 2025, "Svarog Finance" failed to comply with the prudential leverage ratio — the company is obliged to bring its activities into compliance with legislation. The ultimate beneficiary of "Svarog Finance" is listed as Vladyslava Futkova; the head is Oleksandra Mykhailova.

Why this matters

This is not minor regulatory routine — it is a signal to the market: protecting the consumer and the stability of the financial system is more important than the convenience of unscrupulous businesses. The world and Western analysts are closely watching how Ukraine cleanses its financial ecosystem — everyone agrees that such steps increase investment appeal and trust.

It is important to understand: NBU decisions come into force from the day they are communicated to the institutions — by sending them by mail or to the email address. For consumers this means greater transparency; for the market — a reminder that the rules apply equally to everyone.

Conclusion: consequences for the market

This step by the NBU is a historic moment in strengthening Ukraine's financial security. It demonstrates that our state is ready to make unpopular but necessary decisions on the path to stability. If compliance with the rules becomes the norm, our citizens will receive better service, and unscrupulous players will lose the ability to undermine trust.

Against the backdrop of recent fines against other companies (for example, sanctions against "Ye Hroshi" on December 1 for consumer rights violations) it is clear: supervision is tightening, and that benefits everyone who pays taxes and protects their home.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026