Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Beijing Confirmed: Xi Agreed to Buy American Aircraft in Exchange for Tariff Reduction

# China's Ministry of Commerce Confirms Trump-Xi Trade Deal on Mutual Tariff Cuts China's Ministry of Commerce has officially confirmed an agreement between Trump and Xi Jinping on mutual tariff reductions. The package includes purchases of American aircraft by the Chinese side. Here's what stands behind this deal and why the details remain undisclosed.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Beijing Confirmed: Xi Agreed to Buy American Aircraft in Exchange for Tariff Reduction
Фото: EPA

China's Ministry of Commerce confirmed: Xi Jinping and Donald Trump reached an agreement to reduce tariffs on certain categories of goods. At the same time, Beijing agreed to purchase American commercial aircraft — a detail that the Chinese side disclosed first, before any official statements from Washington.

What is known about the deal

According to China's Ministry of Commerce, the tariff reduction concerns specific commodity groups, the full list of which has not yet been fully disclosed. Aircraft purchases — presumably referring to Boeing products — figure as a symbolic gesture of good faith from Beijing. This is a scheme classic to Chinese diplomacy: a large contract as a demonstration of willingness to compromise without legally binding enforcement mechanisms.

It is notable that China disclosed confirmation of the agreement first. This is no accident — Beijing is shaping its own narrative about who and on what terms "conceded."

Context: the trade war has not ended

Recall: since the beginning of Trump's second presidency, the US has imposed tariffs on Chinese goods at levels up to 145%, while China responded with tariffs up to 125% on American imports. Both economies felt the pressure — American retailers warned of empty shelves, Chinese exporters — of production shutdowns.

The current agreement is the first publicly confirmed step toward de-escalation. However, "reducing tariffs on certain goods" and "ending the trade war" are fundamentally different things.

Why Boeing, and why now

An aviation contract is not just business. Boeing is under pressure due to a series of safety scandals and production problems. The Chinese market is critically important for the company: before the trade conflict began, China was one of the largest buyers of American aircraft. The return of these orders means jobs in key states, an argument for Trump domestically.

For Xi, it is also beneficial: Airbus cannot meet all the demand from Chinese airlines, and COMAC — the domestic manufacturer — is not yet ready for large-scale deliveries of narrow-body aircraft.

What remains open

The agreement is signed — but without a publicly disclosed verification mechanism for compliance. It is unknown which specific commodity groups will receive tariff reductions, for what period, and under what conditions they will be revoked. Chinese practice of "confirmed intentions" without legal formalization has already repeatedly created problems for American negotiators.

If within six months neither Boeing receives signed contracts for aircraft deliveries nor the list of reduced tariffs becomes public — will the Trump administration acknowledge that the agreement remained merely a declaration?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026