Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Turning point in cogeneration: 71 units and 3.1 GW — how this strengthens Ukraine's energy resilience

The State Agency for Energy Efficiency has recorded a 40% increase in qualified cogeneration installations. Why this matters for grid security, investments and tariffs — briefly and to the point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Turning point in cogeneration: 71 units and 3.1 GW — how this strengthens Ukraine's energy resilience

Why this news matters

The State Agency for Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving (SAEE) calls 2025 a turning point for Ukrainian cogeneration: 71 qualified units40% more than in 2024. This is not just statistics: behind the numbers are growth in local generation, investment, and options for stabilizing heat supply during a crisis.

"This year we recorded a real boom – 71 cogeneration units were qualified by the SAEE. That's 40% more than last year"

— Hanna Zamazieieva, head of the State Agency for Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving

What changed — key figures

The total electrical capacity of qualified cogeneration units reached 3.1 GW, thermal — 9.2 Gcal/h. This represents roughly +20% in electrical and +11% in thermal capacity compared with 2024 (2.57 GW and 8.3 Gcal/h, respectively).

Qualification grants the right to state support: in particular, exemption from the excise tax (3.2%) on revenue from the sale of produced electricity — an important incentive for investors.

Investments and plans

According to the agency, in the past year and a half 125 MW of new capacity has been commissioned — about €210 million of direct investment. Over the next two years, at least 250 cogeneration units with a total capacity of 1.1 GW are planned to be installed. To achieve this, the SAEE estimates about €1.9 billion more is needed.

  • Odesa region — 193 MW
  • Kyiv — 185 MW
  • Dnipropetrovsk region — 164 MW
  • Lviv region — 143.6 MW

Context: where this fits in the energy picture

The Ministry of Energy notes that in 2025 the country commissioned 762 MW of new gas-fired generation. Cogeneration complements this trend but with a different focus — more efficient fuel use and local resilience of grids and heat supply. For Ukraine, which is under strain on its infrastructure, this means reducing dependence on large centralized nodes and faster restoration of services after strikes or accidents.

What this means in practice

Cogeneration increases energy efficiency: simultaneous production of heat and electricity reduces fuel losses and lowers costs for cities and enterprises. The state creates tax and qualification incentives — and business responds with investments. This is a signal to both domestic and international investors: the sector is becoming more predictable and attractive.

Conclusion

The figure of 71 qualified units is not an end in itself, but a marker of a changing energy model: decentralization, efficiency, and collective resilience. The next step is to turn the stated plans (1.1 GW and €1.9 billion) into signed contracts and launched projects. The question remains concrete: who and on what terms will enter these investments — state players, international funds, or the private sector?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026