Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Utility bill recalculation: government finds UAH 36.4 million in unaccounted January payments — what it means for Kyiv residents

Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko announced a recalculation: due to service interruptions in January, consumers were not charged 36.4 million hryvnias. We explain who will receive compensation and what to do next.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Utility bill recalculation: government finds UAH 36.4 million in unaccounted January payments — what it means for Kyiv residents
Фото: depositphotos.com

Briefly about the main point

The government carried out a recalculation of utility bills for January — UAH 36.4 million were not billed to consumers due to partial or complete non-provision of services. This is a direct result of disruptions in the supply of heat, water and electricity during winter attacks on the power system and severe frosts.

What and how much was not billed

  • UAH 16.6 million — for heat supply;
  • UAH 9.9 million — for hot water;
  • UAH 3.9 million — for water supply;
  • UAH 5.7 million — for sewage (wastewater disposal);
  • UAH 257.6 thousand — for waste management.

"In Kyiv in January, due to interruptions in service delivery, residents were not billed UAH 9.1 million for water supply and sewage, and charges for centralized heat supply were not applied at all. We are talking about bills amounting to billions of hryvnias that were not issued for payment"

— Yuliia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister of Ukraine

Why this happened

The reasons for the recalculation are clear and interrelated: massive Russian strikes on the power system, the resumption of power outages in autumn 2025, and extreme frosts (down to −25°C). In the capital, damage to combined heat and power plants played a critical role: Darnytska CHPP-4 suffered critical damage as a result of the strike on February 3 (more than 1,100 buildings in the Darnytskyi and Dniprovskyi districts were affected), and after the attack on January 24 CHPP-6 ceased operations. As a result, a number of consumers effectively did not receive the services they had been billed for.

What consumers should do

The steps are simple and practical: check January bills, keep reports/photos documenting the absence of services, contact the supplier to request a recalculation and, if necessary, contact the State Consumer Service (Derzhprodspozhyvsluzhba). Detailed instructions on recalculating heating charges and related procedures were provided by experts in a piece on LIGA.net.

Context and consequences

This is not just an accounting operation. Recalculations are a sign that the state is responding to systemic failures and protecting consumer rights. At the same time, it is a reminder of the vulnerability of infrastructure: repairs to CHPPs and restoring stable heat supply will require time and resources. For many Kyiv residents this is a matter not only of money, but of comfort in their apartments during the frosts.

Conclusion

The recalculation of UAH 36.4 million is a necessary step to restore fairness. But the main thing now is to turn these declarative decisions into prompt payments and repair work. In short: the state has responded, now it is important that recalculations and service restorations reach every consumer.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026