Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

First Resident of Defence City — Drone Maker "Vampir": What It Means for the Defence Industry

A new legal regime comes into effect on January 5, 2026: “Vampyr” has become the first resident and will receive tax and regulatory preferences. We examine why this matters for security, investment, and the relocation of manufacturing.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 2, 2026 · 2 min read

First Resident of Defence City — Drone Maker "Vampir": What It Means for the Defence Industry

The first resident of Defence City is the producer of "Vampir" drones

Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal announced that the first resident of the new legal regime for the defense sector is a company that manufactures drones "Vampir", "Shraik" and interceptors for Shaheds. This is a signal: the state is moving critical defense production into a separate support regime to speed up modernization and strengthen supply-chain resilience.

"Defence City has officially launched"

— Denys Shmyhal, Prime Minister

What is Defence City

Defence City is a special legal regime of state support for defense enterprises, which comes into force on January 5, 2026. To become a resident, an enterprise must demonstrate strategic importance and meet defined standards, including having a certain share of defense revenue in its income structure.

What benefits residents will receive

Residents receive a package of tax and regulatory relaxations designed for long-term modernization and export capacity:

  • exemption from corporate income tax provided profits are reinvested;
  • exemption from land, environmental and property taxes;
  • simplified customs procedures and eased export controls for military goods;
  • special foreign-exchange relief measures from the National Bank;
  • the ability to restrict access to certain information in public registers;
  • support for relocating production and measures to increase the security of manufacturing facilities.

Why this matters now

The move comes against the backdrop of major credit support for the sector: on December 26 a consortium agreement for 21.5 billion UAH was signed for the defense-industrial complex. The combination of financing and tax incentives creates a kind of "multiplier" for investment in production, security and exports — i.e., tangible effects on the country's defense capability.

Practical effects — relocation of enterprises to safer regions, accelerated procurement of components, and increased rates of serial production of interceptors and reconnaissance UAVs — could be felt in the medium term, if implementation mechanisms work quickly and transparently.

What's next

Key risks are bureaucratic delays in selecting residents and insufficient oversight of the use of benefits. A winning scenario requires government declarations to be turned into signed contracts and concrete infrastructure projects.

Brief forecast: if the state ensures a transparent selection environment and control over reinvestment, Defence City could become a catalyst for modernization of the defense-industrial complex. If short-term gains prevail, the impact of the benefits will be much smaller.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026