Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Raising price caps cut power outages by one and a half rounds — how it protects households and the economy

The National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Utilities (NKREKP) reports: higher price caps attracted record imports and shortened the duration of power outages. We explain why the decision was made and what risks remain.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 11, 2026 · 2 min read

Raising price caps cut power outages by one and a half rounds — how it protects households and the economy
Юрій Власенко (Фото: Міненерго)

In brief

Raising the price caps on the wholesale electricity market during daytime hours, according to the NEURC, reduced the duration of outages by roughly one and a half rounds. The regulator’s head, Yurii Vlasenko, spoke about the effect of the mechanism change at a session of the Verkhovna Rada.

Why this happened

In mid‑January the regulator raised the price caps after a series of missile‑and‑drone strikes on the power system. As a result of damage and forced restrictions on certain types of generation, losses of available generating capacity during peak hours reached large percentages of consumption.

"In peak periods losses of available generating capacity reached up to 40% of the volume of actual electricity consumption in the country. This means that almost half of the needs could not be met by domestic generation without resorting to emergency reserves, imports, or consumption restrictions."

— Yurii Vlasenko, head of NEURC

How raising the price caps helped

The higher upper price limit sent an economic signal to the market: imports became more profitable and their volumes grew significantly. In the first ten days of February, according to the regulator, imports nearly doubled compared with early January — daily deliveries reached about 50,000 MWh, or almost 20% of daily consumption. This relieved pressure on domestic generation and reduced outages.

"Record volumes of imported electricity were mobilized... This allowed the duration of electricity outages for consumers in Ukraine to be reduced by one and a half rounds."

— Yurii Vlasenko, head of NEURC

Technical details of the decision

According to the NEURC decision, from 17 January through 30 March inclusive the maximum price cap on the day‑ahead and intra‑day markets is set at UAH 15,000/MWh, and for the balancing market — UAH 16,000/MWh in all hours.

What this means for people and business

The decision produced a short‑term effect on energy availability — fewer outages means more stable operations for businesses and household consumers. However, higher price caps may also affect wholesale and potentially retail prices. Therefore it is important that the regulator and government act on two fronts in parallel: secure imports and reserves now, and accelerate restoration of domestic generation and investment in network resilience.

Analysis and forecast

The NEURC decision is a rational response to a resource deficit and external pressure (including rising prices on neighboring European markets). The social effect — reduced outages — is already noticeable. The next step must be technical and economic: reduce the system’s vulnerability through diversification of supplies, preserve social guarantees for the most vulnerable consumers, and incentivize repair and modernization of generation.

Now the question for market leaders and international partners: how much will this temporary relief turn into a lasting strengthening of Ukraine’s energy security?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026