Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

After the massive strike on February 7, some nuclear power plant units are running below full capacity — what it means

Ukrenergo reports reduced generation and outage schedules. We explain which substations were affected, why this affects nuclear power plants, and what energy workers are doing now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 9, 2026 · 2 min read

After the massive strike on February 7, some nuclear power plant units are running below full capacity — what it means

What happened

After a massive Russian strike on February 7, some of Ukraine's nuclear power units have been operating at reduced capacity for the third day in a row. This was reported by the transmission system operator — Ukrenergo. Due to damage to key network elements, one power unit completely disconnected, while others are operating in limited modes.

"Restoration of equipment is underway around the clock after two consecutive massive attacks on the power system. Thanks to the persistent work of energy crews, it was possible to move from emergency to planned hourly outage schedules in most regions. Due to damage to key high‑voltage substations, some nuclear power units are still not operating at full capacity"

— Ukrenergo, transmission system operator

"The targets of the strike were substations on which the operation of nuclear power plants depends"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Details of the attack

According to operational reports, the enemy used a combination of cruise missiles, hypersonic missiles and hundreds of strike UAVs. Among those recorded: 2 Zircon missiles, 21 Kh‑101 cruise missiles, 16 Kalibr missiles and 408 attack UAVs of the Shahed, "Gerbera" and "Italmas" types. The main directions of the strike were Lviv, Ivano‑Frankivsk, Rivne and Vinnytsia regions.

  • There were 13 missile impacts and 21 strike UAV impacts across 19 locations.
  • Substations and 750 kV and 330 kV overhead lines — key for transmitting generation, including from NPPs — were damaged.
  • The enemy also struck generation at thermal power plants (Burshtyn, Dobrotvir TPPs).

Consequences for the power system and citizens

By striking high‑voltage substations and lines, the adversary sought not only to reduce overall generation, but also to complicate the transmission of power from NPPs and TPPs to consumers. Ukrenergo was able to shift most regions from emergency to planned hourly outage schedules, but the need for energy savings remains around the clock.

This means short‑term power restrictions in certain regions may recur until key substations and lines are restored. At the same time, the work of energy crews and the shift to planned schedules minimize the risk of chaotic blackouts.

What’s next

Restoration is technically complex and resource‑intensive: repairing transformers, supports and high‑voltage lines requires time and materials. Experts emphasize that alongside rebuilding infrastructure, preventive measures are important — diversifying power sources, strengthening substation protection, and international assistance in the form of spare parts and equipment.

While energy crews work on restoration, the resilience of the system depends on everyone: conscious electricity consumption and readiness for hourly schedules make it possible to withstand peak loads and speed up the return to normal grid operation. Whether there will be enough resources and time to fully return NPPs to full generation before the next challenges is the key question in the coming days.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026