Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

OnlyFans seeks buyer for 60% stake following founder's death. Platform valued at $5.5 billion — half the asking price

Leonid Radvinsky, a native of Odesa, died of cancer at age 43 — and now his legacy has become the subject of negotiations between OnlyFans and a little-known credit fund, Architect Capital, from San Francisco.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 17, 2026 · 2 min read

OnlyFans seeks buyer for 60% stake following founder's death. Platform valued at $5.5 billion — half the asking price
Фото: depositphotos.com

On March 20, 2026, Leonid Radvinsky — an Odesa native, owner of OnlyFans and the man who transformed the platform into a money-generating machine — died of cancer at age 43. He kept his illness secret. A week after his death, the company announced: negotiations about selling a stake are ongoing.

What is being sold and to whom

According to Wall Street Journal and Axios, OnlyFans is in exclusive negotiations with Architect Capital to sell 60% of the company — not a minority stake, as previously reported. The deal is structured as $3.5 billion in equity capital plus $2 billion in debt, giving a total valuation of $5.5 billion.

Architect Capital is a credit fund founded in 2021 that specializes in asset-backed loans for early-stage startups. It has not previously provided financial services to content creators. This is precisely the stated goal of the partnership: developing new financial products for content authors.

Why $5.5 billion is a defeat for negotiators

As recently as early 2025, Radvinsky was seeking buyers at a valuation of $8 billion. At that time, negotiations with investor group Forest Road Company hit a dead end. The current offer is a third less than the original ambitions.

"The valuation reflects investor caution toward platforms closely associated with adult content, despite strong financial performance."

mlq.ai, citing sources familiar with negotiations

OnlyFans' financial performance is indeed strong: $7.22 billion in gross revenue in the 2024 financial year and $684 million in pre-tax profit — more than Reddit for the same year. Radvinsky managed to pay himself $1.8 billion in dividends in early 2025.

The main problem that money hasn't solved

OnlyFans has suffered for years from payment systems: Visa, Mastercard and banks are reluctant to work with platforms dominated by adult content. This is precisely why a credit fund appeared in the deal structure — Architect Capital positions itself as a solution to this problem through its own financial instruments.

  • In 2021, Visa and Mastercard suspended OnlyFans payments following journalistic investigations into illegal content
  • The platform then announced a ban on explicit content — and reversed the decision within 5 days under pressure from creators
  • The payment processor problem has never been systematically resolved

Who now controls the company

Radvinsky acquired 75% of Fenix International Ltd. in 2018 from British founders — Tim Stokely and his father. Following his death, the succession structure is not being disclosed. Negotiations with Architect Capital are being conducted in exclusive mode — meaning the company is not currently speaking with other buyers, but the deal has not yet been signed.

If Architect Capital obtains 60% of a platform with $7+ billion in annual revenue but cannot solve the payment systems problem — what exactly are these "new financial products for creators" they plan to build, and on what infrastructure?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026