Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Valentino Garavani dies — how the "last emperor of fashion" leaves a legacy and a challenge for the luxury market

Italian couturier and founder of the House of Valentino died at 93. His aesthetic was not just about dresses — it was part of cultural soft power and the economic landscape of fashion.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Valentino Garavani dies — how the "last emperor of fashion" leaves a legacy and a challenge for the luxury market

What happened

Italian designer and co-founder of the fashion house Valentino, Valentino Garavani, has died at the age of 93. This was reported on Monday, January 19, by the Italian news agency ANSA. The cause of death has not been specified; according to the report, he passed away at his home in Rome surrounded by loved ones.

"Valentino is the unquestioned master of style and elegance, an eternal symbol of Italian haute couture. Today Italy loses a legend, but his legacy will continue to inspire generations. Thank you for everything."

— Giorgia Meloni, Italy's Prime Minister

"We have lost an icon of Made in Italy, who made our country a global paragon of excellence."

— Antonio Tajani, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Italy

Legacy: more than fashion

In 1960 Garavani, together with Giancarlo Giammetti, founded the Valentino House, which quickly gained an international reputation for the refinement of its cuts and its ability to shape public images. Among his most famous works are Jacqueline Kennedy's wedding dress for her marriage to Aristotle Onassis, garments for Iranian Empress Farah Pahlavi during her 1979 departure, and a dress for the First Lady of France in 1995.

He was called the "Last Emperor of Fashion" — a sobriquet cemented in the documentary The Last Emperor (2008) by director Matt Tyrnauer, which focuses on the end of his career and the passing of the aesthetic mantle. Garavani remained artistic director of the House until 2007, even after several ownership changes: the sale to the HdP group in 1998 and the subsequent transfer to Marzotto in 2002.

Economic and cultural context

Valentino's profit drop of 22% in 2024 is not just a statistic: it is a symptom of a broader slowdown in demand for the luxury segment. For the reader, this means that style icons today must compete not only on aesthetics but also on market strategies, innovations in digitalization, and brand reputation.

Culturally, a figure like Garavani functions as soft power: his designs entered the public sphere of world leaders and stars, shaping perceptions of Italian style. This is a lesson for the Ukrainian creative industry as well — cultural products can become simultaneously symbols and economic assets if supported by a consistent strategy.

What’s next

Valentino now faces the task of preserving Garavani's creative legacy while adapting to market challenges. Whether the brand's owners will act as guarantors of its historical identity, or whether transformation into a corporate project will undermine the couturier's persona — this will determine how international fashion retains elements of classical elegance in the 21st century.

For Ukraine, Garavani's example is a reminder: cultural symbols carry weight and economic value. The question is whether we can craft our own global stories that will serve the image and development of the creative economy sectors.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026