Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Vladyslav Kyrychenko, founder of Nash Format who shaped Ukraine's non-fiction market, has died

On Tuesday, January 20, entrepreneur and philanthropist Vladyslav Kyrychenko, 57, died. It is a loss for the Ukrainian book industry: his publishing house became a platform for ideas that today carry no less weight than weapons.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Vladyslav Kyrychenko, founder of Nash Format who shaped Ukraine's non-fiction market, has died

What happened

On Tuesday, January 20, entrepreneur and philanthropist Vladyslav Kyrychenko died in his 58th year of life. He was 57 years old. This was reported on the official Facebook page of the publishing house «Nash Format».

“This morning Vladyslav Kyrychenko passed away — the founder of the 'Nash Format' brand, founder of the NGO 'Community of Ukrainian Reformation'. He was 57 years old. The cause of death was a serious oncological disease.”

— Facebook page of the publishing house «Nash Format»

Briefly about his career

Kyrychenko was born on November 1, 1968, in Horlivka. In the 1990s he founded the biotechnology company Helicon in Russia, which became one of the leaders in the Russian market for equipping biological laboratories. In 2006, while in Russia, he founded the publishing house «Nash Format», which later turned into one of the leading Ukrainian players in the non-fiction segment and a large online bookstore.

Why it matters

The non-fiction market in Ukraine in recent years has become not only a commercial project but also a platform for public discussion — from economics to national identity. The business founded by Kyrychenko and his philanthropic activity contributed to the professionalization of the industry and the creation of channels for disseminating ideas that influence the public discourse.

In the context of the prolonged struggle over values and the information space, such institutions have strategic significance: they form the country’s intellectual resources, which work for its resilience in both peacetime and wartime.

What’s next

The loss of a key figure raises questions about succession and the preservation of the platforms that have been built. For readers, it is a prompt to pay attention to independent publishing initiatives and to support those institutions that will continue working with ideas and facts.

Professionals emphasize that the business model and team of «Nash Format» have the potential for autonomous development, but the founder’s role in building trust and network connections was crucial.

Conclusion

This is more than another news item about the death of a well-known person. The loss of those who created informational and cultural institutions is a blow to the infrastructure of ideas. Now the task of society and the market is to preserve these institutions and multiply their contribution to national resilience.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026