Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Over 50 million hryvnias from fishing auctions: how these funds are being returned to waterways and communities

The average increase in lot prices was more than a third above the starting price. Auctions on Prozorro.Sales generated budget revenues earmarked for fish restocking and local needs. We examine where the money went and what this means for food and environmental security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 18, 2025 · 2 min read

Over 50 million hryvnias from fishing auctions: how these funds are being returned to waterways and communities

These auctions are not just additional receipts for the treasuries. They combine market competition with financing the restoration of aquatic ecosystems and supporting local budgets, which is important for food security and the economies of communities.

What happened

Since the beginning of the year, the Prozorro.Sales system has held 189 successful auctions for the right to industrial fishery. According to the press service of the State Fisheries Agency, auction participants actually paid 52.3 million UAH, which significantly exceeds revenues before the introduction of the auctions.

"As a result of the auctions, industrial fishers under concluded contracts actually paid 52.3 million UAH, which far exceeds the cash revenues obtained before the introduction of auctions for commercial fishing."

— Press service of the State Fisheries Agency

Where the funds went

The distribution of proceeds is clearly divided: 41.2 million UAH went to local budgets, and another 11.1 million UAH was directed to the state special fund for restocking water bodies. These funds are being used to restore populations in priority aquatic sites.

The largest receipts were recorded for the Dniester estuary, the Kremenchuk and Kaniv reservoirs. Examples of specific auctions illustrate the effect of competition: a commercial fishing lot for the Kamianske Reservoir with a starting price of 490.9 thousand UAH was sold for almost 1.3 million UAH.

"This year, at the auctions the final price of lots for fish catches on average rose by more than a third over the starting price."

— Serhiy But, CEO of Prozorro.Sales

Effect for populations and communities

Part of the funds are already working toward restoration: this year there was restocking of the Dniester estuary, the Kremenchuk and Kaniv reservoirs. For example, in the Cherkasy region financing from the regional budget (co-financed with auction proceeds) made it possible to release 61.5 t of silver carp fingerlings; on November 25, 18.5 t of white and mottled silver carp were released into the Kremenchuk Reservoir.

At the same time, industrial catch in the country remains below pre-crisis levels: in 2023 the catch amounted to 11,190 t (+12% vs. 2022), and in 2024 — 11,883 t (+6% vs. 2023). This means that the financial effect of the auctions is important but not a self-sufficient answer to restoring the sector.

On September 23, the Ministry of Economy announced the start of auctions for restocking the Dnipro — but of the first five tenders only two proved successful, indicating uneven competition and a need to improve procedures.

Conclusion

The auctions have shown that a market mechanism can create resources for restocking and supporting communities. However, the effect will depend on two things — the stability of competition in the auctions and the transparency of fund use. If these elements are preserved, the auctions can transform from a one-off revenue source into a systemic tool for restoring fish stocks and strengthening local budgets.

Question to sector leaders and communities: how broadly will it be possible to translate these local victories into a long-term strategy for population recovery and creating jobs locally?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026