Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Frontline TPPs Receive Gas Cap: NERC Responds to Mass Cogeneration Shutdown

# Translation: After the cancellation of the PSO in March took hundreds of megawatts of gas generation offline, the regulator introduced a price cap on gas for power plants in nine frontline regions — those that balance the grid where repair crews cannot always reach.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Frontline TPPs Receive Gas Cap: NERC Responds to Mass Cogeneration Shutdown
Фото: Чернігівська міськрада

On May 12, the National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Utilities (NKREKP) set a ceiling price for natural gas for power plants in front-line regions that provide reserve capacity substitution in the power system. The decision was a direct response to a crisis that began six weeks earlier.

What happened in March

On March 30, the government amended Resolution No. 222 on special obligations in the gas market. The preferential price — 19,000 UAH per thousand cubic meters — remained only for two categories: electricity producers in front-line regions and plants that launched cogeneration units for the first time after December 1, 2025. All other heat and power companies across Ukraine lost access to subsidized gas for selling electricity to the grid.

From April 1, most thermal power companies halted cogeneration. According to an assessment by the Association of Critical Infrastructure Operators, hundreds of megawatts of capacity simultaneously left the system. As Espreso reported, only nine regions were exceptions: Chernihiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Mykolaiv, and Odesa.

What did NKREKP decide and why is this not the same as PSO

The new NKREKP resolution is not a return to the old PSO model. The ceiling price applies exclusively to those plants that perform the function of reserve capacity substitution: they maintain voltage in the network when main generation is lost or comes under attack. In front-line regions, this role is critical — main infrastructure is damaged, and restoring it under fire is much more difficult than in other parts of the country.

"The adopted changes are intended to create conditions for attracting additional generating equipment to balance the power system and reduce the risks of capacity deficits, especially in the most vulnerable — front-line — regions."

From the official NKREKP statement

Ukrenergo previously supported the abolition of PSO for gas generation in general: according to a company representative, subsidized gas encouraged thermal power plants to operate during surplus hours, when the system was already limiting solar generation. But the situation in front-line regions is a separate case: there, generation is needed not for profit, but for the physical resilience of the local network.

Context: cogeneration record amid regulatory fluctuations

According to the results of 2025, the State Energy Efficiency reported 71 qualified cogeneration units — 40% more than in 2024. The total electrical capacity of qualified cogeneration units reached 3.1 GW. The regulatory changes in March and May demonstrate the reverse side of this boom: rapid growth of distributed generation collided with equally rapid changes in subsidy conditions.

  • Preferential gas (19,000 UAH/thousand m³) remains only for front-line regions and new cogeneration units commissioned after December 2025.
  • Other heat and power companies must purchase gas at market prices — the mechanism for this transition does not yet exist.
  • Reserve capacity substitution in front-line regions now receives a separate pricing regime from NKREKP.

The question is not whether the regulator's decision is justified — the logic is clear. The question is whether a similar mechanism will appear for heat and power companies in other regions before next winter when electricity demand again exceeds available capacity.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026