Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

RegioJet exits Poland after five months: advertising banned, slots slower, fine on the way out

# A Czech Private Carrier Entered the Polish Market in September 2025 and Left by May 2026, Managing to Receive a Threat of a Million-Dollar Fine and Accuse State Rival PKP Intercity of Predatory Behavior. The Case Now Goes Far Beyond Just Railways.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 9, 2026 · 2 min read

RegioJet exits Poland after five months: advertising banned, slots slower, fine on the way out
Фото: RegioJet PL / Facebook

Five months — that's how long it took Czech RegioJet to understand that Poland's domestic rail market is closed to newcomers. Starting May 3, the company is halting all domestic routes in Poland and refunding passengers.

How it started — and where it broke down

RegioJet launched its first Polish route, Krakow-Warsaw, in September 2025. In December, additional routes were supposed to appear: Warsaw-Gdynia and Poznan-Warsaw. But already in November, the company postponed Poznan — because PKP Intercity allegedly allocated it slower time slots on the same routes where PKP itself travels faster. Simultaneously, RegioJet claimed that the state carrier blocked competitor advertising at train stations.

PKP Intercity rejected both accusations, stating it "operates completely transparently and in accordance with the highest ethical standards." However, the regulator was moving in another direction: on April 8, 2026, the Polish railway authority recognized that RegioJet violated passenger rights through mass cancellations immediately after entering the market, and announced a possible fine of up to 2% of the company's annual revenue.

"Unfortunately, we are forced to cease operations on the domestic Polish market."

— Radim Jančura, RegioJet owner, in a statement to employees (quoted by Money.pl)

What remains and what comes next

RegioJet is not leaving Poland entirely. International routes — Warsaw-Prague and Przemyśl-Krakow-Prague — continue to operate. In other words, the company remains a transit player but is abandoning domestic competition.

In a statement to the Polish press, RegioJet said it had "lost hope and faith" in the possibility of fair business in Poland and hinted at filing a complaint with the European Commission regarding anticompetitive practices. This is not the first conflict in the company's portfolio: in Czechia, RegioJet has been in court for years with state-owned České dráhy over similar accusations.

Why this is bigger than one carrier

Poland is one of the EU's largest rail markets, and PKP Intercity receives significant state subsidies. There is effectively no mechanism to prevent these subsidies from being used to squeeze out private competitors through price or operational advantage — or such a mechanism doesn't work fast enough. RegioJet encountered this and exited. The next private carrier attempting to enter Poland's domestic rail market will have this precedent before its eyes.

  • Market entry: September 2025
  • Stated obstacles: slower time slots, advertising ban at train stations, dominance of subsidized competitor
  • Fine threat from regulator: up to 2% of annual revenue
  • Exit: May 3, 2026
  • Next step: possible complaint to the European Commission

If the European Commission does open proceedings against PKP Intercity — it will change the game rules for the entire EU rail liberalization market. But if the case stalls in years of procedures, the precedent will mean something else: state railway monopolies can effectively block competitors without even breaking any formal rules.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026