Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Record tanker inventories: how falling oil exports are eroding the Kremlin's revenues and increasing pressure on the aggressor

Russian oil inventories at sea have exceeded 150 million barrels — this is putting pressure on exports and is already reducing the Kremlin’s revenues. We break down the figures, the causes, and what this means for Ukraine’s security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 16, 2026 · 2 min read

Record tanker inventories: how falling oil exports are eroding the Kremlin's revenues and increasing pressure on the aggressor
Фото: pixabay.com (ілюстративне)

Quick hook

Reuters reports: due to sanctions and falling demand, Russian oil companies risk sharply cutting production in the coming months. This is not an abstract economic problem: lower oil revenues directly constrain funding for the war against Ukraine.

What happened

According to the agency and analysts, Russian oil exports are declining and storage facilities are filling up. Some of the supplies are accumulating on ships — their volume has risen in recent months to a record over 150 million barrels. At the same time, some tankers have slowed their pace, indicating falling demand and difficulties in selling the product.

Figures to know

According to Kpler, seaborne exports fell from 3.8 million barrels/day in December 2025 to 3.4 million b/d in January, and were about 2.8 million b/d in February. Onshore storage capacity is estimated at roughly 100 million barrels, while total Russian production is about 9.3 million b/d. It is this balance that creates the risk that the onshore buffer will be "exhausted" and pressure on exports will intensify.

What the experts say

"Output could fall to around 300,000 barrels per day in the period from March to May due to logistical constraints",

— Jorge León, head of geopolitical analysis, Rystad Energy

Reuters and Kpler also note that while some demand is shifting to India and private Chinese buyers, their capacities are limited. On February 2, US President Donald Trump, after a conversation with Indian Prime Minister N. Modi, said that India had agreed to reduce official purchases of Russian oil — if confirmed, export pressure will rise even more.

Consequences for Russia and for Ukraine

Because of declining exports and growing discounts on Russian oil, the Kremlin's oil and gas revenues are already taking a serious hit: in January they fell by half compared with January 2025. Fewer revenues mean fewer resources to wage war and less economic resilience. For Ukraine this is an opportunity — sanctions and market pressure are beginning to translate into real economic losses for the aggressor.

What to watch next

A short list of indicators that will determine how the situation develops: the pace of monthly exports (Kpler), volumes of stocks on tankers, the discount on Russian oil, and the activity of private buyers in China and India. Political decisions by partners — from tightened controls to coordinated sanctions — will determine whether this trend remains temporary or turns into a systemic crisis for Russia's energy sector.

Analytical conclusion

Market constraints are already reducing the flow of money to the Kremlin. For Ukraine it is important that these results do not remain only lines in analytical reports: coordination among partners, enhanced monitoring and the political will to turn pressure into lasting economic constraints are needed — then the decline in the aggressor's revenues could become one of the factors that weaken its war machine.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026