Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Reliance returns to Russian oil — what it means for the market, sanctions and Ukraine

An Indian oil giant has again contracted deliveries for February–March. We explain why this is not just a business decision: from the impact on Russia’s revenues to a test of European sanctions and the implications for Ukraine’s energy security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Reliance returns to Russian oil — what it means for the market, sanctions and Ukraine

What happened

Indian Reliance Industries Ltd, owner of the world’s largest oil refining complex, in February and March again contracted tankers with Russian oil after a month-long pause, Reuters reports citing people familiar with the matter. The last time the company received Russian oil was in December.

Reliance has a long-term agreement with Rosneft for 500,000 barrels a day for the refinery in the state of Gujarat; the total capacity of its complex is 1.4 million barrels a day. The company operates two refineries and, according to its explanations, plans to process Russian crude at the plant aimed at the domestic market, leaving the second one for export.

Why this matters

Reliance’s return has several levels of significance. First, it indicates that demand for cheap Russian oil among large refiners remains. Second, it is a real test for the enforcement mechanisms of the EU sanctions regime.

"From 21 January the EU will not accept fuel produced at refineries that received or processed Russian oil within 60 days prior to the date of shipment."

— European Union, official statement

The "60-day" rule calls into question the export plans of companies that simultaneously handle Russian feedstock on the same infrastructure. That is why Reliance emphasizes the separation of flows between the two plants.

Implications for the market and for Ukraine

In the short term, additional supplies may restrain upward pressure on oil prices. However, the structural impact of sanctions on Russian oil revenues remains: according to preliminary Reuters estimates, Russia’s oil revenues may have fallen by about 46% in January due to lower prices and a stronger ruble.

For Ukraine, the key question is not so much fuel prices as the effectiveness of sanctions and the transparency of supply chains. If opportunities to circumvent restrictions grow, the pressure intended to limit financial flows to the war will be reduced.

"We will process oil from Russia at the facility that is oriented to the domestic market. This will allow us to continue supplying fuel to the EU from the second refinery oriented to export."

— Reliance Industries, press service

Short outlook

The reasons for the return are simple and rational: the economic benefits from the discount on Russian oil and the need for feedstock for large refining capacities. However, what happens next will depend on the strictness of controls by the EU and its partners. Ukraine should focus on two things: pursuing transparent monitoring of supplies and strengthening international coordination of sanctions — because that is what limits the aggressor’s ability to finance the war.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026