Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Rheinmetall: the war will not end in 2026 — the manufacturer has more ammunition than contracts

Rheinmetall's CEO warns of a protracted conflict; the group proposes expanding production in Ukraine and could ramp up supplies, but faces a funding shortfall — what this means for the security and industrial resilience of our country.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 16, 2026 · 2 min read

Rheinmetall: the war will not end in 2026 — the manufacturer has more ammunition than contracts
rheinmetall. Фото EPA, HANNIBAL HANSCHKE

Why this matters

In an interview with Table.Briefings, the CEO of the German conglomerate Rheinmetall, Armin Papperger, said that Russia's war against Ukraine "will not end in 2026." This is not just a forecast: according to him, the company is already producing more ammunition than it has contracts for — and at the same time sees the possibility of building capacities in Ukraine. For the reader, this means a simple fact: the need for ammunition and equipment may be long-term, and therefore the necessity of strategic planning for supplies and financing is real.

What Papperger said

"Russia is not interested in this"

— Armin Papperger, CEO of Rheinmetall

"We are producing more ammunition than we have contracts for. In some places, funding is lacking"

— Armin Papperger, CEO of Rheinmetall

In addition, Papperger said the company can supply additional air-defence systems, ammunition and tanks, and that in Europe, due to ramped-up production, ammunition prices are falling. Rheinmetall has also received a plot for an ammunition factory in Ukraine and is ready to begin construction, and after the purchase of the Luerssen unit is considering expansion in the naval sector.

Implications for Ukraine

First, the forecast of a protracted conflict underlines that what is needed is not just one-off aid but a structure of support — supplies, financing, logistics and a production base. Second, Rheinmetall's offer to expand production in Ukraine provides a practical opportunity to strengthen the country's defence capability and create local jobs, but this requires agreements on financing, protection of facilities and technology transfer.

Industrial context and the market

The presence of overproduction without corresponding funding is a typical symptom of a market that rapidly scaled up after 2022. This is a chance to reduce costs and build up stockpiles, but only if partner states turn intentions into contracts. The acquisition of Luerssen allows Rheinmetall to diversify its product line — notably towards naval systems — which could change the balance of supply in the European arms market.

What’s next

Defence-market analysts note: if partners do not secure funding, overproduction risks remaining unrealised, and the possibility of localising production in Ukraine may go unrealised. Therefore, the ball is now in the court of states and international financial institutions: declarations need to be converted into contracts and investments that will ensure both supplies to the front and the long-term resilience of industrial supply chains.

Source: Table.Briefings; quotes — Armin Papperger, CEO of Rheinmetall.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026