Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

NSDC approves resilience plans for all regional centers except Kyiv — preparations for next winter must start now

After an exceptionally harsh winter of 2025–2026, the National Security and Defense Council adopted comprehensive plans for the regions. Why Kyiv was given additional time and what will change for communities and infrastructure.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 3, 2026 · 2 min read

NSDC approves resilience plans for all regional centers except Kyiv — preparations for next winter must start now
Фото: пресслужба Офісу президента

NSDC decision: concise and to the point

The National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) on March 3 approved resilience plans for all oblasts and regional centers of Ukraine, except Kyiv. The information was released by President Volodymyr Zelensky on social media: the decision is intended to develop practical measures to protect infrastructure, logistics and the energy sector ahead of next winter.

“The experience of this winter will form the basis for further decisions, namely: upgrading protection for infrastructure, logistics, major energy facilities, restoring sites after Russian strikes, and providing additional capabilities for the energy sector.”

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Why Kyiv is a separate case

According to the official explanation, Kyiv was given extra time because the capital was not ready according to the standards the NSDC is embedding into the new plans. This is not a symbolic postponement — these are detailed, substantive documents that must take into account the lessons of the winter of 2025–2026.

Those lessons are painful and specific: massive attacks on the energy sector, prolonged blackouts, shutdowns of heating and hot water, the operation of warming centers and school closures; in several regions there were freezing peaks down to -25°C. It is precisely such scenarios the NSDC is trying to anticipate and neutralize.

International support and resource backing

As an element of social proof: the President of the European Commission officially announced a plan to support Ukraine’s energy system worth about €920 million for the winter of 2026–2027. It is a vote of confidence and a real resource — however, money alone will not replace planning and local coordination.

The government also reported measures to restore stations — in particular using equipment from old TPPs/CHPs in the region to repair Ukrainian capacity. But the equipment requires engineering integration, the supply of components and time to bring it online.

What this means for communities

The NSDC decision is not a one-off declaration. It concerns a range of practical steps: strengthening physical protection of key facilities, backup logistical chains, mobile power sources, evacuation plans for critical sites and algorithms for rapid service restoration. The key challenge is transforming plans into projects with clear timelines and financing.

Outlook

The coming months will determine how much the NSDC’s decisions translate into real network resilience and reliable services. The question is simple: will local authorities, the central government and partners be able to marshal resources into operational programs before the start of the heating season? The answer will decide whether last winter’s experience repeats or whether the system becomes significantly more resilient.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026