Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Saldo to face trial for theft of grain worth UAH 5.3 billion — prosecutor's office classifies it as a war crime

The Office of the Prosecutor General has forwarded an indictment to the court against the head of the occupying administration in Kherson region — a case that will test the mechanism for bringing collaborators before the International Criminal Court.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Saldo to face trial for theft of grain worth UAH 5.3 billion — prosecutor's office classifies it as a war crime
Володимир Сальдо (Фото: Кремль)

What happened

On 20 March the Office of the Prosecutor General sent a new indictment to court against Volodymyr Saldo — the head of the occupation administration on the left bank of the Kherson region. He is accused of organizing a systematic scheme to seize and smuggle Ukrainian grain; according to the investigation, the total value of the appropriated products exceeds UAH 5.3 billion. The case was investigated as a war crime, and the prosecutor's office says it intends to seek to hold the accused accountable also before the International Criminal Court.

"The indictment in the proceeding was forwarded to the court on the grounds of organizing the systematic theft of grain and its removal from temporarily occupied territories"

— Office of the Prosecutor General

Mechanics of the scheme

According to the investigation, in 2022 under Saldo's leadership the occupation administration systematically confiscated grain from farmers and seized enterprises and grain terminals. The stolen goods were transported to the ports of temporarily occupied Crimea and to Russian regions (Krasnodar Krai, Rostov Oblast), from where they were shipped by sea to Syria, Egypt, Turkey and Lebanon under the guise of Russian produce. Nine executors of this scheme have already stood trial.

Evidence and timeline

Earlier, in September 2024, the Kherson regional prosecutor's office reported completing the pre-trial investigation in relation to one episode — the removal of around 3,000 tonnes of grain from the Kherson Bread Products Plant. The indictment in criminal proceeding No.1202423000000147 (dated 27 August 2024) has been sent to the Kherson City Court; the Uryadovyi Kuryer noted that Saldo is being summoned to the hearing on 30 March.

International dimension and significance for Ukraine

Qualifying the actions as a war crime opens not only criminal-legal prospects at the national level but also the possibility of international response: from transferring materials to the International Criminal Court to using the evidence in sanctions and restitution processes. This is an important test of the system's ability to restore justice, hold organizers of economic crimes during war accountable, and raise the question of returning stolen property.

What’s next

The next steps are court hearings in Ukraine and coordination with international institutions. There are obvious challenges: collecting evidence in temporarily occupied regions, cooperation with foreign jurisdictions and issues of extradition. Nevertheless, the filing of the indictment itself is a signal: regardless of how long the process takes, the state is documenting the facts and building a legal basis for future claims.

Summary: the Saldo case is not only a criminal proceeding. It is a test for the law enforcement and judicial system, and a message to potential accomplices: economic crimes during aggression are being recorded and will have consequences. Now it is up to the courts — will indictments turn into convictions and will it be possible to recover the stolen assets?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026