Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Samsung earned in a quarter more than in the entire previous year — and this is only 5% of the HBM market

Samsung Electronics' operating profit in the first quarter of 2026 reached $37.8 billion — a record in South Korean corporate history. The paradox: the company is not yet a leader in the very chips that sparked this surge.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Samsung earned in a quarter more than in the entire previous year — and this is only 5% of the HBM market
Фото: EPA

In the first quarter of 2026, Samsung Electronics recorded operating profit of 57.2 trillion won ($37.8 billion) — a 755% year-over-year increase. According to Reuters, this marks the first time in history that any South Korean company has exceeded the 50 trillion won mark in a single quarter. Samsung's previous record of 20.07 trillion won was set just in the fourth quarter of 2025.

The figure exceeded LSEG analyst forecasts of 40.6 trillion won and, according to preliminary data, exceeded the company's total operating profit for the entire 2025 year.

Memory chips account for 95% of results

The semiconductor division (Device Solutions) generated approximately 54 trillion won — roughly 95% of total profit. The catalyst was driven by two simultaneous factors: DRAM and NAND flash prices nearly doubled over the quarter amid supply shortages, while demand for server memory for AI infrastructure shows no signs of slowing. Total revenue reached 133 trillion won ($88 billion) — up 68% year-over-year.

"This is the highest result in Samsung Electronics' entire history."

— from the company's official preliminary results report

Record despite loss in key segment

And here begins the unexpected twist in this story. HBM chips (high-bandwidth memory) — the very type of memory that powers GPUs for training AI models — brought Samsung less than 10% of DRAM revenues, according to Heungkuk Securities analyst Son In-jun. Meanwhile SK Hynix, the main competitor, controls over 62% of the HBM market by shipments, with Samsung and Micron splitting the remainder equally — about a quarter each.

The company has already suffered reputational damage: Samsung's HBM3E failed to pass Nvidia qualification for an extended period. According to Digitimes, Samsung is now close to a deal to supply over 30% of Nvidia's HBM4 chips in 2026 — an attempt to regain position through the next generation product.

What's next

Analyst Son In-jun forecasts that in the current quarter Samsung's operating profit could reach 75 trillion won — if the memory price cycle doesn't reverse. The global semiconductor market in 2026 is approaching the $975 billion mark, with the memory segment growing at approximately 30% year-over-year, according to WSTS.

Samsung is demonstrating record profit at a moment when its share in the most profitable segment — HBM for Nvidia — remains minimal. If Nvidia's HBM4 qualification succeeds and Samsung secures over 30% of supplies, the coming quarters will show whether the company can convert technical catch-up into structural advantage — or whether 2026's record remains an artifact of a general price boom rather than its own technological superiority.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026