Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

SBU Sanatorium in Vorzel Undergoes Reconstruction — Second Time in a Century After Occupation

State Enterprise "Vorzel Sanatorium" announced a tender for 15.3 million hryvnias for the reconstruction of the main medical building. For the village, this is already the second attempt to rebuild after devastating occupation—the first was after 1943.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 7, 2026 · 2 min read

SBU Sanatorium in Vorzel Undergoes Reconstruction — Second Time in a Century After Occupation

State enterprise "Vorzel Sanatorium" of the Security Service of Ukraine has announced a tender for the reconstruction of the main medical building. The expected cost is over 15.3 million hryvnias from the state budget. The work involves comprehensive infrastructure modernization: in particular, an overground passage will be built between buildings for more convenient movement of patients and staff.

A resort destroyed twice

Vorzel is more than just the address of a departmental sanatorium. Since the early 20th century, the settlement in the Bucha district has been a full-fledged resort, known beyond Ukraine's borders. During 1941–1943, German occupation destroyed numerous health facilities in Vorzel — but the resort was restored relatively quickly. The second time — and equally unexpectedly — the blow came in 2022.

"It is symbolic that the occupiers, who themselves could have come here for rest earlier, dealt Vorzel a no less significant blow for the second time"

— All-Ukrainian Association of Amalgamated Territorial Communities on the context of destructions

Russian forces entered Vorzel at the end of February 2022 from the direction of Bucha. According to the KSE Institute, 541 buildings out of 6,649 existing ones were damaged during the occupation, with 117 of them completely destroyed or severely damaged. The cumulative losses to the settlement exceed 52 million dollars.

What is being built and with whose money

The SBU sanatorium in Vorzel is not the only facility being gradually repaired. Since 2023, the facility has already conducted several smaller tenders: for upgrading heating and water supply systems in basements (3 million hryvnias), for developing design and cost documentation for bathroom repairs, for boiler room equipment maintenance services. The current tender is the largest in this series.

  • Overground passage between buildings — a new infrastructure unit that did not previously exist
  • Financing — exclusively from the state budget
  • Customer — a state enterprise subordinate to the SBU, registered in 2015

Prozorro records the tender as active: submission of proposals is open. The winner will be determined through a standard open bidding procedure with special features — that is, without simplified wartime exceptions.

The question is not about money

15 million hryvnias for a departmental sanatorium of a special service — a sum that in peacetime would not require explanation. Now the question is different: how many SBU employees actually undergo rehabilitation in Vorzel, and whether the facility's occupancy corresponds to the scale of the investment. If the sanatorium after reconstruction operates at full capacity and accepts not only departmental patients but also veterans from other security forces — the expenditure would look justified. If not — this is already a question for the supervisory function of the Accounting Chamber.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026