Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Sanctioned tanker passes through Strait of Hormuz — no one stops it

Rich Starry, a Chinese tanker under US sanctions, crossed the strait unobstructed on the second day after Trump imposed the blockade. This is the first practical test of the new maritime operation — and it has revealed its limitations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Sanctioned tanker passes through Strait of Hormuz — no one stops it
Фото: Vesselfinder

At first, it looked like a retreat: Rich Starry turned around 20 minutes after the blockade began and went back. But the next day, the tanker made another attempt — and passed through. Without delay, without intervention from the American fleet.

What is this vessel and why does it matter

Rich Starry is a tanker with a deadweight of 36,000 tons, previously known as Full Star. It belongs to Full Star Shipping, which shares contact details with Shanghai Xuanrun Shipping Company — a company under US sanctions since March 2023 for helping Iran circumvent energy restrictions. In the AIS signal's destination field, the vessel indicated: "Chinese owners and crew."

According to Kpler and MarineTraffic, on board are 250,000 barrels of methanol, loaded at the Emirati port of Khamriah, not at Iranian ports. This is likely what determined the outcome.

Where the real line of the blockade lies

Trump initially announced a complete blockade of the strait. But CENTCOM quickly narrowed the wording:

"Central Command forces will not impede freedom of navigation for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from ports that are not Iranian."

US Central Command

The blockade took effect after US-Iran peace talks in Islamabad on Saturday ended without results. Over 40 days of war, Iran earned approximately $9 billion from oil exports; the blockade is estimated to cost Tehran about $150 million daily.

Reaction and side effects

Brent crude oil prices rose 7% — to around $102 per barrel, compared to about $70 before the war began. The IEA, World Bank, and IMF warned that even after shipping resumes, fuel and fertilizer prices could remain high for a long time due to infrastructure damage.

The British government refused to support the blockade, stating it supports freedom of navigation and opening the strait as "urgently necessary for the global economy." Macron called for a "peaceful multinational mission" to restore shipping.

  • What the blockade stops: vessels heading to or from Iranian ports
  • What it doesn't stop: sanctioned vessels carrying cargo from non-Iranian ports
  • Dark transits: shadow fleet vessels that disable AIS remain beyond effective control

Precedent, not exception

Rich Starry is not an isolated case. Reuters reports that the same day, another sanctioned tanker entered the strait. Rich Starry's passage shows not a failure of the blockade, but its architectural limitation: it is targeted, but easily circumvented through transshipment in neutral ports.

If Beijing systematically redirects Iranian oil loading through third ports — such as Khamriah — before the US closes this loophole, will enough of the blockade remain to force Tehran back to the negotiating table?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026