Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Shell sells stake in Schwedt oil refinery — a test of Germany’s energy security

The sale of an asset, the majority of which is owned by a Rosneft subsidiary, turns a business operation into a geopolitical issue. We explain why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

Shell sells stake in Schwedt oil refinery — a test of Germany’s energy security

What happened

Company Shell has resumed attempts to sell its stake in the German refinery PCK Schwedt, Reuters reports, citing three sources. The asset draws attention not only as a business object but also as an element of energy infrastructure, part of which (54.17%) belongs to the German subsidiary of Russian Rosneft — Rosneft Deutschland.

The German government temporarily took control of Rosneft Deutschland's assets in September 2022 to guarantee energy security, and has been renewing that regime every six months.

Candidates and background

An earlier attempt by Shell to sell its stake to the British Prax Group failed. According to Reuters, among those interested this time is private trader Liwathon Group, Tibor Fedke, a partner at German law firm Noerr who advises Liwathon in Germany, said.

"Liwathon Group is one of the interested buyers,"

— Tibor Fedke, partner at Noerr

Key facts

Schwedt supplies most of the fuel for Berlin (including the airport), gasoline for filling stations in eastern Germany, and critical feedstocks for the local chemical industry.

In February 2024 Reuters, dpa and Handelsblatt reported that the German government had considered the possibility of nationalising Rosneft Deutschland, but this did not occur. On October 29 the U.S. Treasury Department issued a licence exempting Rosneft's German subsidiary from U.S. sanctions until April 2026. On October 30 Reuters recorded renewed discussions in Germany about potential nationalisation.

Why it matters (for Europe and for Ukraine)

This transaction is not simply a change of owner. When a key refinery is controlled by or linked to Russian assets, it creates a geopolitical vulnerability. For neighbouring countries, including Ukraine, the stability of European energy supplies is a matter of security and economic importance.

The sale of the asset could reduce the Kremlin's influence in the EU's energy infrastructure, but the effect will depend on who the buyer is and under what conditions. If the new owner is a transparent European investor subject to proper regulatory scrutiny, the risks will be reduced. If the buyer has opaque links or serves the interests of third parties, the vulnerability will remain.

What’s next

A few key markers to watch: decisions by regulators in Berlin on whether to permit a sale or to nationalise; the ultimate owners of potential buyers; the reaction of sanctions partners; and the duration of the U.S. licence until April 2026. The answers to these questions will determine whether Schwedt becomes simply a business transaction or a precedent in reducing Russia's strategic influence over Europe's energy sector.

Conclusion. The ball is now in the German authorities' and regulators' court: declarations must be turned into transparent decisions that take into account both economic interests and regional security concerns.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026