Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Seven Years, Contractor Bankruptcy, and $11.6 Billion: Golden Pass Finally Ships First LNG

A plant in Texas started operations after the main contractor Zachry went bankrupt with a $2.4 billion cost overrun — and this is just the first of three technology modules.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 23, 2026 · 2 min read

Seven Years, Contractor Bankruptcy, and $11.6 Billion: Golden Pass Finally Ships First LNG
Golden Pass LNG (фото – QatarEnergy)

On April 23, the tanker Al-Qaiyyah with a capacity of 174,000 cubic meters took the first shipment of liquefied gas from the Golden Pass terminal in Sabine Pass, Texas. Behind this line in the QatarEnergy press release lies seven years of delays, one corporate bankruptcy, and a bill that has grown by a quarter compared to the initial estimate.

How $9.25 billion became $11.6 billion

When in 2019 the joint venture of QatarEnergy (70%) and ExxonMobil (30%) signed a contract with contractor Zachry Industrial, the project cost $9.25 billion. By August 2022, it was already $11.6 billion: pandemic inflation, supply chain disruptions, hundreds of official warnings from Zachry about budget overruns, which, as the company later claimed, ExxonMobil ignored.

In May 2024, Zachry filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11,

"citing pandemic-driven cost inflation and delays"

Riviera Maritime Media
— and halted work for several thousand construction workers on the site. After a settlement, Zachry exited the contract; McDermott and Chiyoda International took over the completion.

What has been launched — and what hasn't

Currently only the first of three technological modules (Train 1) is operational. According to OilPrice.com, the construction and commissioning of Train 2 and Train 3 are ongoing. The plant's design capacity is 18 million tons of LNG per year, which will make it one of the largest export terminals in the US — but only after all three modules reach full capacity.

The launch of Train 1 itself occurred with delays: initially the facility was supposed to begin operations in the first half of 2025, then the deadlines shifted by approximately six months, and the first LNG at the facility was obtained even earlier — on March 30, 2025 — as a technological "cool-down" of the equipment.

Why this matters beyond Texas

Golden Pass was built for global LNG demand, which surged after 2022 — when Europe began urgent reorientation away from Russian pipeline gas. Full capacity of 18 million tons per year represents approximately 10% of the total LNG import volume to the EU in 2023. Qatar gains not only profit from gas sales but also a foothold for American exports: QatarEnergy controls 70% of the enterprise on US territory, which provides flexibility in cargo routing depending on market conditions.

  • First shipment: tanker Al-Qaiyyah, 174,000 m³, shipped on April 23, 2025
  • Final estimate: over $11.6 billion versus initial $9.25 billion
  • Delay: Zachry's bankruptcy added at least 6 months to the schedule
  • Readiness: Train 1 is operational; Train 2 and 3 are in the commissioning process

The real question will emerge when Train 2 and 3 reach capacity: will Golden Pass be able to conclude long-term contracts with European buyers at prices competitive with Norwegian pipeline gas — or will the project remain an instrument of Qatari flexibility rather than a true alternative for Europe?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026