Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Spotify has expanded its audience — what this means for Ukrainian artists and cultural security

Swedish streaming exceeded Bloomberg’s forecasts: record MAUs, increased payments to creators and new opportunities — but also questions about the presence of Russian performers. We examine the practical implications for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Spotify has expanded its audience — what this means for Ukrainian artists and cultural security
Фото: EPA / FILIP SINGER

Data: the growth analysts noticed

Spotify Technology SA released fourth-quarter 2025 results that beat market expectations, reports Bloomberg. Subscriber numbers reached 290 million, while the monthly audience (MAU) was 751 million (year‑over‑year +11%; analysts had on average expected 745.2 million).

Quarterly revenue rose by 13% to €4.5 billion, and operating profit amounted to €701 million (versus projected €639.1 million). The company also paid rights holders more than $11 billion over the year — 10% more than in 2024.

Why the numbers matter for Ukrainian musicians

Audience growth and increased payouts are not just a nice chart in a report. For artists and songwriters this means direct income from streams, greater visibility in international playlists, and more opportunities to monetize content. If the platform is growing its MAU, the share of the “wave” of users discovering a new artist also increases.

Platforms as a tool of cultural security

Together with the positive dynamics, political questions arise. In Ukraine there is discussion about blocking Russian performers on international streaming services by decision of the National Security and Defense Council. This raises the question: how to reconcile the protection of the national information space with the legal and business consequences for platforms?

"Russian performers will be blocked on Spotify, Apple Music and other platforms by decision of the National Security and Defense Council"

— Oleksandr Sanchenko, head of the Verkhovna Rada subcommittee on the music industry, president of UAME

What Spotify says

"The fourth quarter of 2025 recorded the largest net increase in MAU in Spotify's history"

— official Spotify statement

"Our 11th Wrapped was bigger, bolder and more inclusive... at the time the Wrapped campaign concluded it had over 300 million engaged users and over 630 million social shares, in 56 languages"

— Spotify press service

Implications and risks

For the Ukrainian industry this is an opportunity: a growing platform means larger payments to creators and more promotional tools. At the same time, decisions to block content create legal and technical challenges for platforms and may affect payout mechanics and the algorithmic distribution of content.

Conclusion

Spotify shows that streaming remains a key channel for the global music market — and therefore for Ukrainian music. The task for the state and the industry now is to turn this growth into stable incomes and a secure information space without losing access to global audiences. Whether platforms, the legal system and the market itself are ready for this is a question of open decisions that will affect our artists' revenues and visibility in the coming years.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026