Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

USA Allowed It — China Refused: Why the Nvidia H200 Chip Deal Remains in Limbo

Washington has issued licenses for ten Chinese companies to purchase Nvidia H200 chips, but no deliveries have taken place yet — Beijing is advising its companies to steer clear of American semiconductors.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 3 min read

USA Allowed It — China Refused: Why the Nvidia H200 Chip Deal Remains in Limbo
Фото: Pixabay

When the U.S. government announced at the end of 2024 that it would permit Nvidia H200 chips to be sold to China, it appeared to be a turning point in a years-long technological blockade. But between the permission and an actual deal, a gap emerged — and it has a specific address: Beijing.

Permission Exists, but Deliveries Don't

Lenovo publicly confirmed to Reuters that it is "one of several companies permitted to sell H200 in China under Nvidia's export license." The list of approved buyers also included Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance, JD.com, and Foxconn — roughly a dozen firms in total. Each of them can purchase up to 75,000 chips.

However, according to Reuters citing sources, no actual deliveries have been made. Chinese companies withdrew after direct signals from their own government.

The "American Transit" Scheme and 25% to the U.S. Treasury

The deal contained conditions that the Chinese side viewed with suspicion. According to Reuters sources, Trump negotiated a scheme whereby 25% of the revenue from chip sales goes to the U.S. Treasury. To legally formalize this levy, the chips must physically pass through U.S. territory before being shipped to China — American law does not permit direct export tariffs. Beijing, according to the sources, sees this as a risk of outside interference or hidden vulnerabilities in the equipment.

"Their shift to Huawei underscores Nvidia's precarious position in China"

Reuters

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly warned that due to export restrictions, the company's share of the AI accelerator market in China has effectively fallen to zero. Before restrictions began, Nvidia controlled roughly 95% of China's advanced chip market, and China accounted for 13% of the company's global revenue.

Huawei Steps Into the Vacuum

While the deal stalls, Huawei is expanding its position. As Financial Times reports, Beijing instructed Chinese technology companies to limit Nvidia chip use to overseas operations while supporting domestic production. By forecasts, Huawei could become the leader of China's AI chip market by 2026 — a market valued at $67 billion by 2030.

This is not merely competitive struggle. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) notes a strategic paradox: the multi-year export restriction policy that the U.S. built over nearly a decade was de facto cancelled by the same administration that established it. And China's forced transition to its own solutions — Huawei Ascend and others — only accelerated precisely because the restrictions existed.

  • H200 — Nvidia's second most powerful chip; the newest B200 is under even stricter restrictions
  • 75,000 chips — the limit per approved buyer
  • 25% of revenue — the U.S. share under Trump's scheme terms
  • $50 billion — Huang's valuation of China's AI market in 2025

Notably, Nvidia halted H200 production in early 2025 — the company, according to Asia Times, decided to focus on products with clearer market prospects. A license to sell a chip that is no longer being manufactured looks like a symbolic concession without practical substance.

The key question here is not whether Nvidia will gain access to the Chinese market — but whether Washington can offer terms under which Beijing will agree to remain dependent on American chips, rather than making a final bet on its own technological stack. If the answer is "no" — the H200 deal will enter textbooks as the moment when the U.S. itself accelerated what it tried to prevent.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026