Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

U.S. forecasts Venezuela’s production will increase 30–40% in 2026 — what it means for markets and security

The U.S. Secretary of Energy said production could rise by 300–400 thousand barrels per day — a development that could affect prices, the geopolitics of energy resources and sanctions instruments, which is also of interest to Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 18, 2026 · 2 min read

U.S. forecasts Venezuela’s production will increase 30–40% in 2026 — what it means for markets and security
Фото: EPA / HENRY CHIRINOS

What it’s about

According to Bloomberg, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright in Paris, during a meeting of International Energy Agency ministers, estimated that oil production in Venezuela could rise by 30–40% in 2026 — that is roughly by 300,000–400,000 barrels per day. Wright said there is “huge interest” among companies seeking to return to the Venezuelan market.

Context

After U.S. sanctions were imposed in 2017, production in Venezuela fell by roughly half. At the same time, Washington made decisions on how proceeds from sales would be handled — some oil could be sold “indefinitely,” with the funds intended “for the Venezuelan people.” There have also been orders in the past to freeze certain funds in accounts at the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Against this backdrop, other market players, notably India, are reassessing supplies: state refiners have been instructed to consider increasing purchases of U.S. and Venezuelan crude amid a gradual reduction in purchases of Russian feedstock.

Why it matters for Ukraine

Economic dimension. Additional barrels on the global market could partially ease price pressure on energy, which would have a positive effect on the budgets of European partners and, indirectly, on the costs of logistics and infrastructure reconstruction in Ukraine.

Geopolitical dimension. An expanded supply from Latin America changes the map of deliveries and could reduce the maneuverability of Russian oil in certain markets. At the same time, opening the Venezuelan market raises the role of commercial interests in sanction-related decisions — and this requires careful coordination between the security and economic priorities of Ukraine’s partners.

Risks. A short-term drop in prices does not resolve market structure: prices remain vulnerable to geopolitical shocks, and revenues from energy sales can again become an instrument of influence in the region.

“There is huge interest among companies looking to enter the Venezuelan market”

— Chris Wright, U.S. Secretary of Energy (according to Bloomberg)

Conclusion

Increased production in Venezuela may slightly relieve the global market and shift the balance of commercial interests. But for Ukraine the more important question is whether international partners can combine economic gains with a long-term security strategy so that the energy shift does not weaken sanctions pressure on those who finance aggression?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026