Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

U.S. delays tanker escorts in the Strait of Hormuz — what it means for Ukraine's energy security

Donald Trump's promise to provide military protection for ships may not take effect until the end of March — meanwhile the closure of the strait is increasing pressure on global energy markets and driving up costs for Ukrainians.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

U.S. delays tanker escorts in the Strait of Hormuz — what it means for Ukraine's energy security
Фото: depositphotos.com

A quiet postponement with strategic consequences

In high diplomacy it's not loud statements but quiet agreements that matter. Energy Secretary Chris Wright told CNBC plainly: "This will happen relatively soon, but not now" — referring to the military escort of tankers through the Strait of Hormuz that Donald Trump promised on March 3.

"We're simply not ready. All our military resources are currently focused on destroying Iran's offensive capabilities and the industry that provides those capabilities."

— Chris Wright, Energy Secretary (CNBC interview)

US position: a temporary pause, not a refusal

Washington's explanation is more functional than political: for now the priority is destroying the opponent's capabilities, not expanding escort operations for ships. According to Wright, the military at the Pentagon are working on this, and implementation could begin by the end of March if the situation allows.

What's happening with supplies — and why it matters for Ukraine

The movement of tankers through the Strait of Hormuz has effectively stopped due to the risk of strikes from Iran. The International Energy Agency (IEA) recorded the largest supply disruption in history, which triggered a spike in energy prices. For Ukraine this means not only higher fuel costs, but increased pressure on public and private budgets, logistics, and energy supply plans for the coming months.

Before the escalation through the strait, about 20% of global oil consumption transited there. Even short-term blockages of such routes lead to immediate market adjustments — and those adjustments are felt by drivers, farmers and energy companies in Ukraine.

Brief forecast: what could change the situation

If a US Navy escort begins by the end of March, it could partially stabilize transit and markets. But if the delay drags on, phases of high prices and logistical uncertainty will continue. Analysts emphasize: the decision to provide escorts is not only a military operation but also a signal of confidence to the markets.

Conclusion

While public attention is focused on loud promises, the real impact is determined by temporary decisions and their economic effects. It is important for Ukraine to track not only when the escort will start, but also what support measures partners are ready to provide in case of prolonged pressure on energy markets.

"Later today I will be at the Pentagon — the military are working on this right now."

— Chris Wright, Energy Secretary (CNBC interview)

The question now falls to the partners: will declarations turn into concrete steps sufficient to reduce the risks that have already hit Ukrainian budgets and pockets?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026