Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Global air-defence stockpiles on the brink: Rheinmetall warns of a shortage — why this matters for Ukraine

Systemic work that isn't always visible in the headlines: the head of Rheinmetall says that stocks of missiles and air‑defense systems are "practically depleted." We examine how this affects the front lines, suppliers, and Ukraine's defense capability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Global air-defence stockpiles on the brink: Rheinmetall warns of a shortage — why this matters for Ukraine
Гендиректор Rheinmetall Армін Паппергер (фото – EPA)

What happened

The CEO of the German defense conglomerate Rheinmetall, Armin Papperger, warned in an interview with CNBC that global stocks of air-defense (AD) systems are “practically exhausted” due to the escalation in the Middle East. Demand for missiles and interceptors has surged — orders are coming from all regions.

"I think that at the moment the warehouses of Europeans, Americans, and Middle Eastern countries are empty or almost empty... If the war in the Middle East continues for another month, I think we will have almost no missiles left"

— Armin Papperger, chairman of the board of Rheinmetall (interview with CNBC)

Why this matters for Ukraine

The war has shown that drones are a relatively cheap means of attack, while countering them requires more expensive technologies. When global stocks are depleted, supply priorities shift to regions with the most acute confrontations. For Ukraine, this means increased competition for the same missiles and interceptors that secure critical infrastructure and reduce battlefield losses.

Data and context

According to SIPRI estimates, between 2021 and 2025 European countries increased arms imports more than threefold, absorbing 33% of global deliveries; nearly half of these supplies (48%) were provided by the United States. The five largest importers in this period — Ukraine, India, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Pakistan — together received 35% of global arms imports.

How the defense industry is responding

Rheinmetall is already announcing large-scale investments and ramping up production: the CEO reported plans to increase artillery shell output from about 70,000 to 1.5 million per year by 2030, and the group’s order book is approaching €70 billion and could double. The company is also in negotiations in the Middle East and expects additional contracts in the coming weeks.

What Ukraine and its partners should do

The situation requires practical steps, not rhetoric. Among the most relevant actions:

  • Expand diversification of supply sources and coordination among allies to avoid Ukraine being "removed" from priority recipient lists at a crisis moment.
  • Accelerate large-scale local production of critical components and munitions through partnerships and technology transfer.
  • Invest in multi-layered defense — a combination of missile interceptors, artillery, electronic warfare (EW) capabilities, and early-detection systems.

Brief outlook

If the escalation in the Middle East continues, pressure on global AD stocks will increase — meaning competition for limited resources will intensify. For Ukraine, this means: the winner will not be the one who asks the loudest, but the one who quickest turns diplomatic efforts into signed contracts and strengthens domestic defense-industrial capacity.

Now it’s up to the partners: declarations must turn into concrete deliveries and technology agreements that will equip our defenders in the coming months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026