Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Trump threatens to destroy Iran's energy sector if the Strait of Hormuz is not opened

The U.S. president called the ongoing negotiations successful, but at the same time vowed to strike power plants, oil wells and Khark Island. Threat and diplomacy — in a single post.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 30, 2026 · 1 min read

Trump threatens to destroy Iran's energy sector if the Strait of Hormuz is not opened
Фото: EPA / AARON SCHWARTZ

Donald Trump, on his social network Truth Social, threatened to destroy Iranian power plants, oil wells and Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf — a key hub of Iran’s oil exports. The condition: if Tehran does not sign a deal and does not open the Strait of Hormuz.

Notably, the threat came in the same post where Trump spoke of “significant progress” in talks with a “new and smarter” Iranian regime. Both messages are a direct channel to a single audience: the Iranian negotiators.

Kharg Island is not just a geographic point. Most of Iran’s oil exports pass through it. A strike on it would mean not only a military escalation but also the blocking of the main source of foreign-currency revenues for the Islamic Republic. To the list, Trump added “possibly all desalination plants” — infrastructure on which the drinking water of millions of Iranians depends.

The Strait of Hormuz — the narrow chokepoint between the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf — handles about 20% of global oil trade each year. Iran regularly threatens to close it in response to U.S. pressure. This time the threat was voiced in the opposite direction.

Trump did not specify what he meant by “opening” the strait: Iran has not officially announced that it has closed it. This is either a diplomatic preemption — pressure before the situation escalates — or a signal that Washington knows of Tehran’s plans that have not yet been publicly declared.

If the negotiations are truly in their final stage — to what extent are these threats a tool of leverage rather than a symptom of their actual collapse?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026