Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Oil transit via "Druzhba": MOL prepares talks with Moscow while Kyiv awaits guarantees

# Head of Hungarian Oil Refiner MOL to Visit Russia Next Week. What It Means for Ukraine, Which Blocked Transit Over Sanctioned Payments The CEO of Hungarian oil refiner MOL, Zoltan Hernadi, is traveling to Russia next week. This development comes as Ukraine has blocked transit over sanctioned payment settlements.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 17, 2026 · 1 min read

Oil transit via "Druzhba": MOL prepares talks with Moscow while Kyiv awaits guarantees
Фото: EPA / ROBERT HEGEDUS

The transit of Russian oil through the Druzhba pipeline via Ukraine could resume within weeks—if the Hungarian side succeeds in obtaining an acceptable payment scheme from Moscow. This was announced by Hungarian Energy Minister Csaba Kóvári, confirming that MOL head Zsolt Hernádi plans a personal visit to Russia next week.

The problem is straightforward: Ukraine has been blocking Lukoil's oil shipments through its pipeline system since the beginning of 2025 because transit payments are processed through a sanctioned Russian bank. Ukrtransnafta cannot physically accept the payment—and is legally not obligated to take the risk for a Hungarian importer.

MOL, which refines this oil at its plants in Slovakia and Hungary, finds itself caught between a rock and a hard place: Kyiv will not compromise on sanctions enforcement, while Moscow is in no hurry to change its correspondent bank. Hernádi is traveling to seek a solution—likely an alternative payment route or a third-party intermediary.

Ukraine has its own calculations here. Transit revenues are not the main argument: based on pre-war tariffs, this involved tens of millions of dollars annually, not a critical budget item. What matters more is this: any scheme allowing Lukoil to pay circumventing sanctions creates a precedent for pressure on Kyiv from EU partners—particularly Budapest, which systematically blocks EU decisions regarding Ukraine.

Slovakia and Hungary officially classify the situation as an energy crisis and are pressing the European Commission. Prime Minister Fico has already called Ukraine's position "energy blackmail." Brussels is staying on the sidelines for now, not acknowledging any breach of obligations by Kyiv—because there formally are none: Ukraine is not obligated to organize transit through sanctioned structures.

The outcome of Hernádi's negotiations in Moscow will determine whether a technical solution acceptable to all parties emerges. But the key question remains open: will Kyiv agree to any scheme that effectively allows Lukoil to continue operating—even if the banking route formally changes?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026