Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Pipeline Instead of Strait: How Saudi Arabia Earned $24.65 Billion on Closed Hormuz

In March 2026, Saudi Arabia's oil revenues reached a three-year high — not despite the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but largely thanks to infrastructure that Riyadh had been building as a backup route for decades.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 21, 2026 · 3 min read

Pipeline Instead of Strait: How Saudi Arabia Earned $24.65 Billion on Closed Hormuz
Ілюстративне фото: depositphotos.com

When the United States and Israel launched a war against Iran on February 28, 2026, and Tehran effectively blocked the Strait of Hormuz to neutral shipping, analysts expected an oil shock for Saudi Arabia. Instead, in March, the kingdom earned $24.65 billion from oil exports — the highest since October 2022, 37% more than a year earlier. Bloomberg attributed this to a swift switch to an alternative route.

A 40-year-old pipeline — and finally needed

The East-West Pipeline, or Petroline — is a 1,201 km pipe from oil fields in Abqaiq in the east of the Arabian Peninsula to the port city of Yanbu on the Red Sea. According to Wikipedia, on March 11, 2026, Aramco converted associated gas pipelines to crude oil, increasing capacity to 7 million barrels per day — twice the pre-war usage. According to Fortune, by the end of March, approximately 5 million barrels of crude oil and 700–900 thousand barrels of refined products were being shipped daily through Yanbu.

"The East-West Pipeline is operating at maximum capacity and helping to mitigate the impact of the global energy shock for our customers"

— Amin Nasser, President and CEO of Saudi Aramco

Aramco's quarterly profit increased by 25% — to $32.5 billion, Fortune reported. For comparison, the company ended 2025 with a 12% decline in annual profit.

What doesn't fit the success narrative

The switch occurred under pressure and with risks that have not disappeared. According to Al Jazeera, in January-February, an average of 770 thousand barrels per day flowed through the pipeline — by the end of March, this figure rose to 2.9 million. The port of Yanbu is holding the load, but BloombergNEF questioned in mid-March whether the port's infrastructure would withstand full capacity.

The risk materialized: as Wikipedia recorded, on April 9, an Iranian drone struck a pipeline pumping station, reducing throughput by 700 thousand barrels per day. In less than three days, Aramco restored full capacity — but a precedent has been established.

  • The Houthis declared their entry into the war on Iran's side and previously attacked the same pipeline — a drone strike in 2019 temporarily halted pumping.
  • The Red Sea was a zone of constant attacks on tankers in 2024–2025.
  • Yemen geographically controls the Bab el-Mandeb Strait — the entrance to the Red Sea from the Indian Ocean.

Why this matters beyond the Arabian Peninsula

According to the IEA, before the conflict began, approximately 15 million barrels of crude oil per day passed through the Strait of Hormuz — nearly 34% of global maritime oil trade. China and India together received 44% of this flow. The Saudi pipeline partially replaces this volume, but leaves Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain — countries without their own alternative routes — without an alternative outlet.

The paradox of the March statistics lies in the fact that the jump in revenues reflects not stability, but the price of crisis: oil became more expensive precisely because of the threat of disruptions, and Saudi Arabia found itself in a rare position — as one of the few sellers able to deliver the goods.

If the Houthis block the Bab el-Mandeb or deliver a critical strike on Yanbu, the pipeline will become a dead end — and then the question is no longer how much Riyadh will earn in April, but whether it will be able to sell oil at all without the Strait of Hormuz.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026