Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Pipeline Built During Iran-Iraq War Now Saves Aramco From Iran-American Tensions

While the Strait of Hormuz is effectively closed and the world has lost nearly a billion barrels of oil, Saudi Aramco has pumped a record 7 million barrels per day through alternative routes — and earned $33.6 billion in quarterly revenue.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 2 min read

Pipeline Built During Iran-Iraq War Now Saves Aramco From Iran-American Tensions
Головний офіс Saudi Aramco в Дахрані, побудований у середині 1970-х років (Фото: Аramco / Facebook)

When in March 2026 the United States and Israel struck Iran, and Tehran blocked the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 million barrels of oil pass daily — a quarter of all global maritime trade — Saudi Aramco found itself in an unusual position: the only major exporter with a ready-made backup route.

A Pipeline from a Past War

The East-West Pipeline (Petroline), stretching 1,200 km, was built precisely for this scenario — during the tanker war in the Strait of Hormuz in the 1980s. In 2026, its capacity was expanded to 7 million barrels per day after converting parallel gas condensate pipelines to crude oil. On March 11, the system was brought to full capacity — two weeks after hostilities began.

The result proved twofold. After conversion, the volume of oil passing through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait increased by 21% compared to February, and all of this flow goes to Asia. But at the same time, an Iranian drone strike on a pumping station in April reduced the pipeline's capacity by 700,000 barrels per day.

Figures That Defy Ordinary Market Logic

Aramco's adjusted net profit for the first quarter of 2026 was $33.6 billion — 26% higher than a year ago and 34% higher than the fourth quarter of 2025, when the company recorded its lowest profit since COVID-19.

This is the largest quarterly jump in net profit in Aramco's history — after 11 consecutive quarters of annual decline.

"The pipeline has proven to be a critical artery of supply — helping mitigate the impact of global energy shock and providing relief for customers affected by shipping restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz."

— Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Nasser, May 2026

The Rest of the Region in a Different Reality

Aramco is an exception, not the rule. Flows through the Strait of Hormuz fell from approximately 20 million barrels per day to just over 2 million barrels per day in March. Even accounting for alternative routes, due to storage capacity limits and constrained bypass pipeline capacity, Persian Gulf countries reduced aggregate production by more than 14 million barrels per day.

Iran also attacked the energy infrastructure of its neighbors — Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Iraq — with missiles and drones. The port of Fujairah — the endpoint of the Emirati pipeline — was hit by drone strikes, disrupting oil export operations.

Brent traded on Sunday at $103.91 per barrel — below the peak above $119 during active hostilities, but significantly higher than the $70 recorded in late February before the war began.

What Comes Next

According to the IEA's assessment, the restoration of flows through the Strait of Hormuz remains the single most important variable for reducing pressure on energy supply, prices, and the global economy.

If a ceasefire opens the strait and Brent returns to $70–75, will Aramco be able to retain investors through dividends — or will the quarterly record prove to be a one-time anomaly of wartime market conditions?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026