Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Trump Tower in Australia Canceled Due to Brand "Toxicity"

Developer Abandons 91-Story Trump International Complex on Golden Shore — Trump's Name Became a Problem, Not an Advantage.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 1 min read

Trump Tower in Australia Canceled Due to Brand "Toxicity"
Trump Tower в Нью-Йорку (Фото: EPA)

Australia's Gold Coast will not see the Trump International Hotel & Tower. The developer has officially abandoned the project, calling Trump's brand "toxic" — and this is perhaps the most frank formulation one could hear from someone who invested money in real estate under this name.

The complex was conceived ambitiously: a 91-story hotel with premium apartments on the Pacific coast. The deal with Trump's organization involved licensing the name — a standard scheme through which Trump monetizes his brand without direct investment. The developer pays for the right to name the building "Trump," receiving in return the marketing halo of luxury.

The problem is that this halo works only as long as the name is associated with success, not with lawsuits, political scandals, and polarization. The Australian real estate market — particularly in the segment of international buyers from Asia — proved to be more sensitive to reputational risks than the developer had anticipated.

This is not the first case. After 2016, several hotels in various countries removed Trump's name from their façades — some due to pressure from residents, some due to declining occupancy rates. A brand that had spent decades selling the dream of American luxury has become a political position. And a position repels part of the clientele regardless of the quality of the concrete.

The Gold Coast, however, is not stopping — the plot is not going anywhere, and the developer is apparently seeking an alternative concept. The question is practical: will another premium brand be found that can replace Trump in marketing materials without losing the target audience that was initially planned to be attracted precisely because of this name?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026