Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Trypillia TPP: 13 strikes, 90% destroyed — and the decision to try again

On November 8, 2025, Russia dealt the heaviest strike against the station since the beginning of the invasion — a year after the state allocated 1.5 billion hryvnias for its reconstruction. The cost and timeline for the new rebuilding remain unknown.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Trypillia TPP: 13 strikes, 90% destroyed — and the decision to try again
Фото: ФДМ

Head of the State Property Fund Dmytro Ntalukha visited the Trypilska TPP and publicly confirmed: the station will be restored. He named neither timelines nor budget. According to Ntalukha, the main task now is stable passage through the heating season and continued reconstruction of infrastructure that comes under attack daily.

This decision is not just a statement of intent. During the full-scale Russian invasion, the station has been attacked 13 times, with approximately 70 missile and drone hits recorded. Approximately 90% of the production assets have been destroyed: thermal-mechanical and electrical equipment, production buildings and structures.

Cycle of destruction and restoration

April 2024: a combined strike by drones and missiles destroyed the turbine shop — then Centerenergo lost 100% of generation. Throughout autumn 2024 and spring 2025, emergency repair work continued; tenders were announced and contracts were concluded for turbine and equipment repairs.

On the night of November 8, 2025, Russia launched what Centerenergo called the most massive strike on thermal generation since the start of the invasion. Trypilska and Zmiyivska TPPs were attacked simultaneously with an "unprecedented number of missiles and countless drones." The company stated: all results of annual repairs were lost.

«The stations are on fire, generation is zero.»

Centerenergo, November 8, 2025

What the numbers mean

Trypilska TPP with an installed capacity of 1,800 MW was the largest electricity supplier to Kyiv, Cherkasy, and Zhytomyr regions — more than half of all Kyiv region generation. In May 2024, the Cabinet of Ministers allocated 1.5 billion hryvnias to Centerenergo for restoring Trypilska and Zmiyivska stations. Now these funds effectively need to be recalculated.

According to Ekonomichna Pravda, after the November 8 strike, rolling blackouts lasting 3–4 shifts continued for weeks; with the onset of frost, the situation could have worsened.

Logic of the decision

Refusing restoration would mean permanently decommissioning Kyiv region's largest power generation facility. Continuing means investing resources in an object that Russia systematically attacks again after each repair. The state chose to continue, but without a public defense plan and without a stated cost.

The key question is not «whether they will restore it,» but whether a mechanism to protect the station will appear before new capacities are commissioned — because without it, the next strike will only repeat the cycle.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026