Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

This is a signal: Uklon, Bolt, Uber, Glovo supported the tax

Four platforms openly backed the "laws for the self-employed" — it's not just about money. UAH 14 billion for the state, OECD requirements and a step toward new financing from the IMF. A historic moment for Ukraine's labor market and digital security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 15, 2025 · 2 min read

This is a signal: Uklon, Bolt, Uber, Glovo supported the tax

While the economy seeks stability, the four largest platforms have laid down their arms in the fight over the rules of the game: Uklon, Bolt, Uber and Glovo have announced support for the "self‑employed laws" that will change the rules for ride‑hailing drivers, couriers and freelancers. This is not just about taxes — it is a marker that business is ready to play by new, transparent rules.

"When it comes to the public good, competition and narrow interests fall into the background"

– Serhii Hryshkov, CEO of Uklon

What exactly is being proposed

These are draft laws No. 14025 and No. 14026. They oblige operators of digital platforms to withhold tax from the incomes of platform users and introduce reporting rules in line with OECD standards and Council of the EU Directive 2021/514. The Ministry of Finance expects to receive about UAH 14 billion in additional revenues per year. The law is planned to be adopted by the end of the year and is to take effect in 2026.

Why this matters to you

This concerns the income security of couriers, drivers and the state at the same time. Western analysts say that implementing such rules increases tax fairness and reduces the shadow economy. For the ordinary user it means more transparent fares and guarantees; for the state — more stable revenues that can be directed to defense, infrastructure and community support.

Social resonance and international context

An open letter with explanations from the companies was published by Ekonomichna Pravda, and the consequences are already being actively discussed online — from drivers' blogs to expert opinions. This is also part of the requirements for receiving a new tranche from the IMF: transparent tax rules for digital platforms are one of the points international financing focuses on.

"This is a step toward tax transparency that enables the state to receive fair revenues from digital business"

– Western analysts

What happens next

Parliament will have to decide quickly — by the end of the year. If the votes are found, the system will start working in 2026 and the market will change forever: platforms will adapt, part of incomes will become transparent, and the state will receive an additional resource. This is a decisive moment: either we enter a new economic reality, or we postpone the transformation for years.

This is not just a technical law — it is a historic moment for the Ukrainian digital economy. The world is watching, investors are counting the steps, and Moscow receives a clear signal: we are building a strong, transparent economy that can withstand the strain of war and is moving toward European integration. The topic is already being debated online, and experts predict: those who manage to adapt will win.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026