Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Strike on Roshen factory in Kyiv: female employee killed, production and public areas damaged

On the night of January 24, a Russian "Shahed" drone struck the building of a confectionery factory in the Holosiivskyi district — this is not only a human tragedy but also a blow to jobs and the city's infrastructure amid mass attacks on the energy sector.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Strike on Roshen factory in Kyiv: female employee killed, production and public areas damaged

What happened

In the night of January 24, as a result of being struck by a Russian Shahed drone, the building of the Roshen confectionery factory in the Holosiivskyi district of Kyiv was damaged. One woman was killed, and two other employees were wounded, the State Emergency Service and Member of Parliament Viktoriia Siumar reported.

“There is destruction on the upper floor of the confectionery factory in the Holosiivskyi district: a woman was killed, two other people were injured”

— State Emergency Service

“She was working in the production workshop so that people would have fresh products in the morning… The workshop also has serious damage… Two more workers were wounded”

— Viktoriia Siumar, Member of Parliament

Official sources and visual confirmation

Footage of the damage was released by The Telegraph photojournalist Yan Dobronosov. Member of Parliament Oleksii Honcharenko added that not only production areas but also the factory’s office premises were affected. The adjacent square with an ice rink and a fountain was also damaged — places many Kyiv residents use in everyday life.

Why it matters

This strike is not just about one factory. First, it is a human loss and a risk to employees of non-military enterprises that continue to operate under shelling. Second, damage to production disrupts supply chains and jobs. Third, hits on public spaces undermine residents’ sense of security.

Context: scale of the nighttime attack

The nighttime strikes on January 24 were part of a powerful wave of attacks across Ukraine: according to reports, about 21 missiles and 375 drones were launched across the country that night, of which air defenses shot down approximately 357 drones and 15 missiles. The main targets were energy infrastructure and areas around Kyiv.

Consequences for Kyiv

Due to power shortages after the mass strikes, several metro stations (including Lisova, Chernihivska, Hydropark, Dnipro) are temporarily closed; train services are operating in a limited capacity. Many buildings are again without heating, and there are problems with water supply in some districts.

What’s next

This is another example of how strikes on non-military facilities affect daily life and the city’s economic stability. It is important that, after documenting the damage, rapid restoration of infrastructure follows, support is provided to those affected, and protection of critical facilities is strengthened.

Now it is up to local services and partners — whether they will be able, in a short time, to restore production capacities and public spaces, and how quickly they can reduce risks for workers and residents in the event of future attacks?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026