Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Strike on the "SICH" terminal in Zaporizhzhia: how the attack affects logistics and security

A morning missile strike on March 17 damaged a major Nova Poshta sorting hub. It's not just material damage — it's a test of the resilience of delivery chains and the safety of employees.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Strike on the "SICH" terminal in Zaporizhzhia: how the attack affects logistics and security
Фото: Запорізька ОВА

Briefly

On 17 March, Zaporizhzhia was hit by a missile strike, partially destroying the "SICH" terminal of the company "Nova Poshta". According to regional authorities and the company's press service, five employees sustained concussions, one was wounded. The company has shifted operations to backup logistics capacities, while planning to restore the terminal's operation.

What the photos and statements show

The published photos show damage near the shelter where terminal employees were at the time of the attack. This is confirmed by both the company's services and regional authorities.

"Five terminal employees sustained concussions, one was wounded."

— Nova Poshta press service

"The strike occurred near a shelter where people were present."

— Zaporizhzhia regional authorities

What this means for deliveries

The "SICH" terminal covers over 8,200 sq. m and, according to the company, has a throughput of up to 16,000 shipments per hour (approximately 384,000 per day). For consumers, the consequence is a potential slowdown in parcel processing in the region, but the company says it is mobilising reserves to maintain delivery stability.

Nova Poshta's national network comprises tens of thousands of branches and parcel lockers, making it critical infrastructure for civilian and volunteer supply. In a January interview with LIGA.net, the company's new management also spoke of plans for large-scale automation and the opening of new sorting centres in 2026 — factors that help withstand such strikes.

Context and consequences

Strikes on logistics infrastructure often have a double effect: the destruction of property and the temporary disruption of deliveries of humanitarian and consumer goods. Logistics experts note that quick switching to backup routes and automated sorting reduce the risk of systemic failures, but do not eliminate short-term interruptions.

For employees and the local community, not only compensation for material losses is important, but also guarantees of workplace safety — shelters, evacuation plans, medical assistance. It is precisely such a practical set of measures that will determine how quickly the hub's full operation is restored.

What's next

Nova Poshta plans to restore the terminal's operation, but the key now is assessing the scale of the damage, staff safety, and restoring delivery chains. This is an example of how civilian infrastructure finds itself at the epicentre of military strategy — and how the speed of response will determine how painful the consequences are for citizens.

Whether the logistics network can withstand new challenges depends on a combination of companies' operational work, support from local authorities and international partners. We will follow updates from the press service and regional authorities.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026