Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ceasefire agreement opened Strait of Hormuz on paper — Iran lets 12 ships pass daily and demands cryptocurrency

After a two-week ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, fewer than a dozen vessels passed through the strait. Tehran has imposed a traffic limit, collecting tolls exceeding a million dollars per voyage and demanding payment in bitcoin or yuan—a scheme that could itself violate sanctions.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 10, 2026 · 3 min read

Ceasefire agreement opened Strait of Hormuz on paper — Iran lets 12 ships pass daily and demands cryptocurrency
Фото: EPA / JIM LO SCALZO

On April 9, 2026, US President Donald Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, with the key condition being the "full, immediate and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz". Within a day, it became clear: the condition was only met in words.

According to Bloomberg and MarineTraffic data, only nine vessels passed through the strait from the morning of April 9 — five exited the Persian Gulf, four entered it. For comparison: before the crisis, daily traffic reached dozens of vessels. Sultan al-Jaber, CEO of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, confirmed that the strait is effectively closed despite the ceasefire — and added that 230 loaded oil tankers are standing inside the gulf.

The Scheme: Quota, Toll, Bitcoin

Details of the deal that Washington did not publicly disclose were revealed by the Wall Street Journal: Iran agreed to allow passage of no more than 12 vessels per day — and to charge a toll of more than one million dollars for each. According to the Financial Times, Hamid Hosseyni, a representative of Iran's Oil Products Exporters Union, explained the mechanism: the ship owner sends an email with cargo details, after which they receive the amount due — approximately $1 from each barrel of oil on board. A large Suezmax tanker carrying a million barrels would pay around a million dollars.

"As soon as the email arrives and Iran completes the assessment, the vessel has a few seconds to pay in bitcoin — so the money cannot be tracked or confiscated through sanctions"

— Hamid Hosseyni, representative of Iran's Oil Products Exporters Union, Financial Times

Payment is also accepted in Chinese yuan through Kunlun Bank via the CIPS system. According to analytics firm TRM Labs, the IRGC has been using crypto infrastructure as a toll collection mechanism since mid-March — the first such precedent in global maritime practice. The potential revenue from the scheme is up to $20 million per day from oil tankers alone.

A Sanctions Trap for Shipowners

For shipping companies, the situation is a legal gray area. As CNBC reports, one of the top executives of a shipping company whose vessels are stuck in the gulf admitted: "We have no information on how to transit during the ceasefire. We are not in contact with Iranian authorities". At the same time, lawyers warn: paying Iran's tolls could be classified as a violation of US and European sanctions. Maersk and other major operators have chosen a waiting strategy.

  • All three oil tankers that passed through the strait in the first days of the ceasefire were under US sanctions for transporting Iranian oil — according to CBS News
  • Iran directs permitted vessels along the northern route — closer to its coast — and warns of military strikes if they deviate from course
  • Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi noted that passage is "possible through coordination with Iran's Armed Forces taking into account technical limitations" — a formulation that leaves Tehran full control over the pace and conditions

What the Numbers Mean

A restriction of traffic by more than 90% means that approximately 10 million barrels of oil per day remain blocked. The Bruegel Institute calculated: full opening of the strait would return 20% of global oil and gas supplies to the market, lower prices and eliminate multibillion-dollar additional costs to the global economy. Instead, 230 tankers inside the gulf accumulate demurrage costs, and insurance rates remain prohibitive.

After announcing the ceasefire, Trump wrote on Truth Social that the US "will help with traffic" and that "big money will be made" — however, no mechanism for monitoring compliance with the agreement's terms was publicly presented.

If by April 11 — the date of scheduled Pakistan talks between the US and Iran — Tehran does not cancel the 12-vessel limit and does not abandon the criminally sensitive crypto scheme, the question is no longer whether the ceasefire is real, but whether G7 countries that depend on supply disruptions will recognize it as such and can legally pay for passage.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026