Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ukraine tops global ranking of arms importers for the third consecutive time — what it means for the front lines and partners

SIPRI: Over 2021–2025 Ukraine received 9.7% of global arms imports. We examine who is supplying them, why volumes fluctuate, and what the implications are for the country’s security and defense capabilities.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 9, 2026 · 3 min read

Ukraine tops global ranking of arms importers for the third consecutive time — what it means for the front lines and partners
Patriot PAC-3 MSE (Ілюстративне фото: DoD US)

Why this matters now

By the end of the five-year period 2021–2025, Ukraine became the world's largest importer of major arms for the third consecutive time, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). This result is not just a statistic: it reflects the scale of external support, dependence on it, and new challenges for defense planning.

What SIPRI's data say

"Ukraine was the largest recipient of major arms in Europe (and in the world), with a share of 9.7% of the total global import of weapons. Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, at least 36 states have supplied Ukraine with major arms."

— SIPRI, 2021–2025 report

Of the total deliveries, the three largest suppliers to Ukraine were United States (41%), Germany (14%) and Poland (9.4%). Together, the five largest importers — Ukraine, India, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Pakistan — received 35% of the world's arms imports during this period.

Why volumes fell in 2025

Deliveries to Ukraine in 2025 were substantially lower than in 2023–2024. SIPRI attributes this primarily to a reduction in US military aid — a critical source of many systems. At the same time, part of the support continued through transit and re-routing mechanisms.

For example, at least 25 states agreed to purchase systems from the US for subsequent transfer to Ukraine under the PURL mechanism. SIPRI counts these transfers as US arms exports, although the actual donors were often Norway, the Netherlands and Germany — underscoring how complex the supply chain has become.

Geopolitics of supplies: winners and losers

In the global export structure, the United States accounted for about 42% of all international deliveries in 2021–2025; the main recipient of American arms overall was Saudi Arabia. France ranked second among exporters (9.8%), and Germany overtook China to become the fourth-largest exporter (5.7%) — part of its deliveries were provided as aid to Ukraine.

Russia was the only one among the top ten suppliers whose exports declined — from 21% in 2016–2020 to 6.8% in 2021–2025 — which has long-term implications for its defense-industrial influence abroad.

Ukraine's defense-industrial complex and return to the market

Alongside imports, Ukraine's defense industry developed significantly over these years. According to the report and public sources, certain segments of the defense-industrial complex have outstripped the state's financial capacity, and by February 2026 Ukraine, in a limited mode, returned to the arms supplier market as an exporter. This is an important signal: the country not only receives assistance, but is also building capabilities that can be monetized and integrated into allied logistics.

Risks and reminders

Despite overall support, several critical risks remain: volatility in the policies of major donors, complex logistical chains of transfer (PURL), and issues of export control over certain systems, notably drones. Experts emphasize the need for a clear state policy on exports to minimize reputational and security risks.

Conclusion — what next

The status as the largest importer of arms confirms that Ukraine's defense remains a collective endeavor in which partners play a decisive role. But it is also a signal — a strategy is needed to transition from external dependency to systemic resilience, combining international assistance, development of the defense-industrial complex, and transparent control mechanisms. The question now is for the suppliers: will they turn current support into a long-term, predictable system for supplying the front?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026