Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ukrposhta prepares service 'like Nova Poshta': digitalisation to operate during blackouts

The state operator announces payment and parcel management via an app, equipment to operate during power outages and cashless payments in villages — this is not only convenience but also savings for branches during wartime.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrposhta prepares service 'like Nova Poshta': digitalisation to operate during blackouts
Фото: Igor Smelyansky / Facebook

Money loves silence: what exactly Ihor Smilyansky announced

Ihor Smilyansky, CEO of JSC "Ukrposhta", announced the next stage of the company's digitization. According to RBC-Ukraine, by the end of February the mobile app may gain the ability to pay for a parcel and manage its delivery — a service that private operators have long offered.

What will change in the services

Key announcements: by the end of summer every employee will receive a "3-in-1" device — a mini-computer with a POS terminal; branches will gain the ability to accept cashless payments even in remote villages; the new terminals can operate for up to eight hours without electricity and will be supplied with power banks.

"It will be just like Nova Poshta."

— Ihor Smilyansky, CEO of JSC "Ukrposhta"

Why this matters — not just about convenience

These changes are an example of practical adaptation of infrastructure to the conditions of a prolonged war. Operating during blackouts without fuel costs will allow branches to maintain operational capacity and reduce expenses that in a village can exceed profits: Smilyansky cited an example that a generator "eats" roughly UAH 15,000 a month for a small branch.

Context and risks

The announcement comes against a backdrop of reputational challenges: in February 2026 Ukrposhta ended cooperation with the Rikky Hype brand after a social media scandal, and a few days earlier the company changed its logo, which also drew online criticism. This shows that digital and operational upgrades will need to be accompanied by careful communication with the public.

What's next — a brief conclusion

Now it's up to implementation: technical solutions need to be scaled and highlighted with transparent savings indicators for each branch. Logistics analysts note that such investments are a marker of trust in the operator and its ability to perform the state's function of connecting with citizens during a crisis. Whether this will be enough to win back skeptics after the branding mistakes is a matter of execution, not announcements.

Source: RBC-Ukraine.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026